Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need new camera


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

what are you trying to do with it? is it a travel camera? are you trying to do zod-level stuff? what do you value?

 

i use sony's NEX-5. sony bought minolta out a number of years ago iirc and launched a compact DSLR to compete with the market and absolutely blew away the competition. this thing is phenomenal and it's like carrying a freaking iphone 6 with an attached lens. they've since added upgrades and a bunch of different specialty lenses, so i'm sure you can upgrade over the NEX-5 (i bought it in 2011.)

 

it won't provide you zod-quality stuff, but if you're looking for a travel/activity camera you won't find one better. the best thing about it for me is that i get outstanding photographs but don't have to carry the thing around in its own case, which is a huge plus for me. i travel with a satchel (and now a messenger bag since i got lightweight macbook) and being able to tote the thing on the go without hauling a special case is invaluable.

 

here's a picture of my ass using it in peru. note how fuging tiny

 

308356_918654636831_1501994946_n.jpg?oh=

 

 

 

here's a picture of the camera 

 

NEX-5_sv_SEL1855_1-1200.jpg

 

 

 

i think i dropped $450 on it at best buy in 2011. i'm sure you can spend more if you add different lenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ I hate to be a whiner but you're using your hands not your ass.

I wonder if you could get an older model for a better price? I've heard Igo say it's more about the lens than the camera

 

the NEX-3 is still on the market i think, but it's not cheap enough to make it worth it, especially now that arsen has landed a sweet new job. he could drop ~700 on an NEX-5 with a couple zoom and wide angle lenses and do anything a guy who isn't trying to run a business needs to do with a camera

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the NEX-3 is still on the market i think, but it's not cheap enough to make it worth it, especially now that arsen has landed a sweet new job. he could drop ~700 on an NEX-5 with a couple zoom and wide angle lenses and do anything a guy who isn't trying to run a business needs to do with a camera

I'm going to take your word for it. I know next to nothing about cameras. I have some dslr I bought a few years ago. I did use it to take a selfie with a moose post-15341-142174408823_thumb.jpg

post-15341-142174408823_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had my Nikon D3200 for a couple of years and really like it, but I agree with Jeremy's assessment that the brand is a lot less important to image quality etc. than proper training. I got a good deal on a zoom lens with it which convinced me to go with that. It's older now but the same package I got is on sale for 500 bucks at Best Buy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need more info about what you want to make a specific choice.

 

Does size matter? (of course it does...) If you want something small, go with what Philly suggested. You'll lose a little bit in image quality, but it's a hell of a lot easier to carry around than a standard DSLR with a heavy-ass lens.

 

What do you typically take pictures of? Landscapes, people, family, sports, etc...This is typically where the lens comes in if you want to get real specific and care about the quality of picture.

 

If none of that really matters and just want something that's good all around, go with CWG's suggestion. Even though I use a Canon, I'm no fanboy. Nikon makes a quality camera and you'll do just fine with it. The fact that it comes with two lenses makes that deal much better and you can always upgrade later on. The 18-55 mm lens is for wider images while the 55-200 mm is the zoom lens. They're not as "fast" as something Jeremy would use in his pictures (corresponding to the f/ stop number...lower the number, the "faster")....but as CWG shows, it's more than sufficient if you're looking for some sporty shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just family pictures. I want clear, good quality pictures. I'm shopping around and will probably end up being a camera in next few weeks. That's why I need suggestions.

canon has a 50mm 1.8 for around $100. I use it for all kinds of things but it's perfect for family stuff, portraits and poo. It's their cheapest lens, and you can tell in the build, but the picture quality is great. The option of opening up to 1.8 gives you perfect depth of field for that stuff.

get a decent DSLR body and you'll be able to use it forever and buy different lenses for everything you need. Take some time to read about how DLSRs and lenses work and you'll be glad you have one. You might end up using it for other things.

A 60d body is like $400.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...