Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Hackett, S TCU


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

Chris+Hackett+SE+Louisiana+v+TCU+AU14w50

 

Chris Hackett, is listed at 6'2 195 pounds. This looks to be close to his size, based off when I watch him in games. He is from Tyler, Texas, and has been playing on a very good TCU defense. Hackett is a very instinctive safety that has the ability to play single high, on a hash, in a two high look, and in the box as extra run support. Very good open field tackler, and wraps guys up, rather then going for the kill shot. Does lunge tackle, but grabs cloth, and legs to secure tackle to the ground. Had 75 tackles his junior year.

 

G2cG60Q.gif

 

lYb6vmF.gif

 

Has played some robber, when he starts high, and fly’s down to play the intermediate middle of the field. Reads the quarterback very well. Does not take many false steps, when breaking on the football.  Have ball-hawking abilities, as exhibited with his 7 INTs.  Takes the proper angles in run support, as well as tracking the football. I think his versatility will intrigue the panthers because he can play both safety spots really well.  Has very fluid hips, and pretty clean footwork with no extra steps when reading and reacting. Will have to show his deep speed, because I do question it. Has to run a decent time 40 at the combine.

 

eToczBL.gif

 

1zJFUxF.gif

 

Carolina likes to play both of their safeties in both roles, and one of the reasons why Charles Godfrey started. Hackett has shown the ability to play man-to-man coverage, and has the height to match up with tight ends over the middle, and outside. Can blitz from the edge, which Carolina does with its safeties as well. Hackett would be perfect for the panthers. Draft media thinks only 1 safety is worth a top 75 pick, but I think Hackett is a solid 3rd -4th rounder. He is also my 2nd safety, behind Landon Collins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the release of DeCoud I'd say it's a sure thing we draft another safety somewhere in this draft. I like Hackett.

Thoughts of James Sample out of Louisville? Like his game as well.

 

i got to find some games of his. Louisville has been producing some DBs lately tho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...