Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it a good idea to spend a bunch of money to cheer yourself up?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

what guitar do you want to buy anyway

 

if it's gibson anything in the $2k range you'll save a lot of money if you buy used, even if it's a 2013 or 2014 model.  like potentially hundreds.

 

There's a '94 Gibson Les Paul Classic with a Bigsby addition that I fell in love with the last time I was there...sounds amazing.  They even let me take it to a rehearsal to try and sell it to me yesterday.  I've shopped there before and I'm friends with the owner though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of guitar we talkin brother? Im more partial to less expensive guitars with souped up pickups for gigging. But if you got the money and a nice amp already then splurge on it. Ill be the first to wish you a happy new guitar day! Also, whats your band called?

 

www.steadylegend.com and I mentioned what kinda guitar I'm looking at in the post above.  I have an American Tele right now but it's just not cutting it for me.  I think it sounds too thin and I don't like how it plays up past the 12th fret.  I have a hot rod deluxe amp and I really like it alot.  Sounds great with many different guitars.  The working mans amp.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not a horrible deal and maybe you can talk em down some. Thatll definetly give you the bigger sonic footprint youre looking for. Just the thing with les pauls is that if that headstock breaks off then theyre never the same. One of the reasons i like the ole bolt on neck strats. It should be fine though if you get a decent hardcase for it and keep the drunk wannabes offstage when youre takin a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a '94 Gibson Les Paul Classic with a Bigsby addition that I fell in love with the last time I was there...sounds amazing.  They even let me take it to a rehearsal to try and sell it to me yesterday.  I've shopped there before and I'm friends with the owner though...

 

yeah that's no surprise.  i've seen the 90s/early 2000s les paul classics going up in price recently.  they were underrated guitars several years back and it was the model i coveted the most, even over the standard.  gibson is currently using the same name for a weight relieved model with this weird three knob configuration that's really not the same thing as the one you're looking at and i think it's turning people off and driving up the resale value of the "real" 1960 style ones.

 

i don't know, i know it's hard to let go of a guitar if it just grabs you like that from the outset.  i have a 2013 traditional plus and the first time i picked it up and played it it was like an extension of my body and i just had to have it.  if you can really, really afford it i say go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's no surprise.  i've seen the 90s/early 2000s les paul classics going up in price recently.  they were underrated guitars several years back and it was the model i coveted the most, even over the standard.  gibson is currently using the same name for a weight relieved model with this weird three knob configuration that's really not the same thing as the one you're looking at and i think it's turning people off and driving up the resale value of the "real" 1960 style ones.

 

i don't know, i know it's hard to let go of a guitar if it just grabs you like that from the outset.  i have a 2013 traditional plus and the first time i picked it up and played it it was like an extension of my body and i just had to have it.  if you can really, really afford it i say go for it.

 

Yea It'd be a huge investment for sure.  I need a second guitar because my band is starting to play some really long gigs...like 3-4 hour slots.  I just need two guitars for that in general.  We're making decent money but I'm so far in debt from fronting the cost of our album that I just need to put everything I make back into that.  So the guitar is straight up out of my savings and I probably won't be able to replenish the cost until next year.  On the bright side I've got plenty saved so it's not hurting me now but, it could always come back to haunt me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 On that hotrod I use one also.

 

Yea man I love it...no need for me to get another amp any time soon.  Been thinking of adding a tap delay pedal.  Using the Boss DD3 now but I'd like something with some presets.  We play some dubbed out reggae sometimes so it'd be cool to mess with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's no surprise.  i've seen the 90s/early 2000s les paul classics going up in price recently.  they were underrated guitars several years back and it was the model i coveted the most, even over the standard.  gibson is currently using the same name for a weight relieved model with this weird three knob configuration that's really not the same thing as the one you're looking at and i think it's turning people off and driving up the resale value of the "real" 1960 style ones.

 

i don't know, i know it's hard to let go of a guitar if it just grabs you like that from the outset.  i have a 2013 traditional plus and the first time i picked it up and played it it was like an extension of my body and i just had to have it.  if you can really, really afford it i say go for it.

 

Also yea, wtf is up with the cost of Gibsons?  Seems to have spiked in the last year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like you kind of answered the question yourself, at least the way I see it

If you want to make a living playing in a band and investing in a new, better guitar will help you get better, as long as your bills are going to be paid on time I don't see much of an issue with it. Sounds like purchase anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've seen a few different explanations for the price spike.  finishing guitars in nitro is expensive and time consuming, the cost of materials keeps going up, they're starting to play with new features like that much maligned automatic tuning system that comes standard on a bunch of their stuff now.

 

and then there's the reaction to that which is the more old school style guitars from previous years (or even like 48 months ago) are starting to command more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...