Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Smoking Be Banned in the Stadium


Recommended Posts

The law changes on January 2, I believe. Will this mean no smoking in the stadium next season?

I wish it were this year, to be honest. I'm fed up with people smoking on and around the concourses when they know they are supposed to go to the smoking areas. Try asking a smoker, politely, to move to one of the smoking areas they tell you you're a Richard. And then try to get an usher or someone to do something about it and it's a joke.

If you're a smoker, please go to the smoking area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dislike smokers more than drunks. The smokers not only hurt themselves, but others around them. It us that has to breath in your damn carbon dioxide. Get that sh*t out of here. THAT'S what gives us the right to tell you where the hell you should smoke.

haha, carbon dioxide?... drunks don't hurt others around them?

you sir, win.

i want to go into marketing, it has got to feel like such an accomplishment to get millions of retards parroting the poo that spews from my ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha, carbon dioxide?... drunks don't hurt others around them?

you sir, win.

i want to go into marketing, it has got to feel like such an accomplishment to get millions of retards parroting the poo that spews from my ass.

Drunk in your home and drunk driving is 2 different things. I'm speaking of course of the former. You already know what smoking does to your body, but it's even more harmful to the people that have to suffer with secondhand smoke. Just because you don't care about the effects of smoking to your body doesn't mean others around you don't care about themselves as well and have to suffer because of your poor decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats messed up that they are banning smoking. I mean cmon, I gotta have my cigarettes. Especially during a real close game, I gotta gotta gotta have my nicotine. I dont go to many games, but if they ban smoking I dont know if I could go unless its the Superbowl :). LOL at people about second hand smoke, do you realize how much crap we breath in everyday? Its crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats messed up that they are banning smoking. I mean cmon, I gotta have my cigarettes. Especially during a real close game, I gotta gotta gotta have my nicotine. I dont go to many games, but if they ban smoking I dont know if I could go unless its the Superbowl :). LOL at people about second hand smoke, do you realize how much crap we breath in everyday? Its crazy.

Yeah LOL at the people that actually want to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...