Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Smoking Be Banned in the Stadium


Recommended Posts

As you can see by my avatar, I like a good cigar from time to time but here is the catch. Even though I like cigars, I understand a lot of people don't care for the smoke, the smell, or anything else about them so I respect the people around me and do not smoke in stadiums, restaurants, or around large crowds. There are plenty of places for me to smoke where I can enjoy my habit and not bother another soul in the world. The problem is....most cigarette smokers don't give a crap about the people around them. They need the nicotine fix so they light up anywhere and puff away. I think most non-smokers don't care if people smoke - they just don't want that smoke around them. If smokers would respect the people around them who may not want to indulge in your smoking habit, legislating smoking areas wouldn't be necessary. Smokers need to fix the problem themselves or the non-smoking people who are fed up will pass laws to fix it for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you can see by my avatar, I like a good cigar from time to time but here is the catch. Even though I like cigars, I understand a lot of people don't care for the smoke, the smell, or anything else about them so I respect the people around me and do not smoke in stadiums, restaurants, or around large crowds. There are plenty of places for me to smoke where I can enjoy my habit and not bother another soul in the world. The problem is....most cigarette smokers don't give a crap about the people around them. They need the nicotine fix so they light up anywhere and puff away. I think most non-smokers don't care if people smoke - they just don't want that smoke around them. If smokers would respect the people around them who may not want to indulge in your smoking habit, legislating smoking areas wouldn't be necessary. Smokers need to fix the problem themselves or the non-smoking people who are fed up will pass laws to fix it for them.

Very, very well said. :cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second hand smoke crowd is the same as the global warming crowd. They are both religions to the believers. There is as much point arguing with them as there is telling someone there religion is wrong.

Scientists, regardless of credentials, who dispute global warming claims are ostracized. They'll offer to debate believers and their opponents refuse and call them idiots.

Doctors who find no causality in second hand smoke and cancer, or who point to air pollution as a much greater risk are similarly insulted and ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just another ploy by our socialist democrat state and federal leaders to slowly strip away our freedoms. i was raised on tobacco, and alot of my family members has had tobacco pay their bills. they are trying to drive tobacco into the ground after jan. 2. Now, that will affect my family's ability to make a living when there is a massive cutdown on smoking, but no one thinks about the people that will be without a job. they just think of themselves and how that little cigarette smell really f'd up their day.

thats my 2 cents worth and i think the whole idea is rediculous. if we want to smoke, let us smoke. do you tell the homos to stop being gay and not try to get married? to tell the women they can or cannot kill their unborn baby?

so many other big issues that matter, rather if my burning cigarette made you wet yourself. how ironic, the state that made tobacco and brought in so much economic growth, is being driven into the ground. so sad......-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just another ploy by our socialist democrat state and federal leaders to slowly strip away our freedoms. i was raised on tobacco, and alot of my family members has had tobacco pay their bills. they are trying to drive tobacco into the ground after jan. 2. Now, that will affect my family's ability to make a living when there is a massive cutdown on smoking, but no one thinks about the people that will be without a job. they just think of themselves and how that little cigarette smell really f'd up their day.

thats my 2 cents worth and i think the whole idea is rediculous. if we want to smoke, let us smoke. do you tell the homos to stop being gay and not try to get married? to tell the women they can or cannot kill their unborn baby?

so many other big issues that matter, rather if my burning cigarette made you wet yourself. how ironic, the state that made tobacco and brought in so much economic growth, is being driven into the ground. so sad......-

Quit being gay, and quit smoking. All that pipe is gonna kill ya. :rofl:

So the answer is YES, I do tell them. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quit being gay, and quit smoking. All that pipe is gonna kill ya. :rofl:

well, sir douchebag, i see you have made a cameo appearance! when my whole family is jobless and homeless because tobacco farming is obselete, we will come live with you then! you might regret that gay comment! ha ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just another ploy by our socialist democrat state and federal leaders to slowly strip away our freedoms. i was raised on tobacco, and alot of my family members has had tobacco pay their bills. they are trying to drive tobacco into the ground after jan. 2. Now, that will affect my family's ability to make a living when there is a massive cutdown on smoking, but no one thinks about the people that will be without a job. they just think of themselves and how that little cigarette smell really f'd up their day.

thats my 2 cents worth and i think the whole idea is rediculous. if we want to smoke, let us smoke. do you tell the homos to stop being gay and not try to get married? to tell the women they can or cannot kill their unborn baby?

so many other big issues that matter, rather if my burning cigarette made you wet yourself. how ironic, the state that made tobacco and brought in so much economic growth, is being driven into the ground. so sad......-

You give me back my family that died from smoking and I'll support your families legal cartel...deal? :cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did not get a chance to get down to your section, my boy was whining that his legs hurt, which they probably did. he didn't wanna get up until halftime and by the 4th quarter he was almost asleep, which means i carried him all the way out of the stadium, down morehead st, and to the parking lot. hell, i almost fell asleep as boring as that game was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You give me back my family that died from smoking and I'll support your families legal cartel...deal? :cheers2:

look man, they smoked, they knew the rules, i know the rules. God rest thier soul. it was their choice. they knew it wasn't healthy. did you hold a gun to their head and force a cigarette on them? didn't think so. if i die from smoking, why is it someone else's fault? thats the problem with this country now, everyone wants to blame somebody else, and no one wants to accept responsibility for their own actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...