Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I feel something very very wrong with Jonathan Stewart


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

How about because the depth chart goes...34,28,33, 24? If you get rid of 28, then 24 assumes the role of 33. If you get rid of 34 and 28, then 33 becomes 34 and 24 becomes 28. Sorry I had to break it down in this rudimentary form, but it is the only way some of you will ever learn the simple basics of depth charts and coaching. Thus, ending up in the equal split that Stewart and Williams enjoyed last year.

You don't get rid of a solid RB like Birmingham, knowing fully well Stewart's achilles might not last through the season, however, that in no way means Stewart isn't expected to play through it in the regular season either.

I think you just wasted a whole lot of time confirming my exact point. And the numbers game you just played was pointless, as it has nothing to do with my initial assessment. I know that players move up the depth chart when one gets injured...HOWEVER...why give carries to someone that ordinarily would not make the team when we could give twice as many to Goodson in the meantime. BECAUSE...the Panthers expect Birmingham to be around in week 1 and maybe beyond. The only reason...there is an injury to another RB they are concerned about (Stewart). Do you understand now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you just wasted a whole lot of time confirming my exact point. And the numbers game you just played was pointless, as it has nothing to do with my initial assessment. I know that players move up the depth chart when one gets injured...HOWEVER...why give carries to someone that ordinarily would not make the team when we could give twice as many to Goodson in the meantime. BECAUSE...the Panthers expect Birmingham to be around in week 1 and maybe beyond. The only reason...there is an injury to another RB they are concerned about (Stewart). Do you understand now?

Because Goodson was a starter, and the starters come out in the third quarter....

Jesus, were you beat about the head with a metal pan as a child? If not, someone should do that now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you just wasted a whole lot of time confirming my exact point. And the numbers game you just played was pointless, as it has nothing to do with my initial assessment. I know that players move up the depth chart when one gets injured...HOWEVER...why give carries to someone that ordinarily would not make the team when we could give twice as many to Goodson in the meantime. BECAUSE...the Panthers expect Birmingham to be around in week 1 and maybe beyond. The only reason...there is an injury to another RB they are concerned about (Stewart). Do you understand now?

Holy Crap, you didn't understand a word of what I said. Clearly I wasted my time, but only because it fell on a seemingly comatose mind. Goodson isn't an every down back, and when Stewart or Williams is out, he's our 1st string back, meaning, he gets as many carries as anyone would normally get in the preseason for a 1st stringer.

Goodson and Birmingham is the equivalent to a second string Williams and Stewart. Goodson is NOT an every down back, and if we ever had to use him as an every down back, we're in trouble, and the coaching staff knows this. We will be keeping Birmingham, rest assured of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you just wasted a whole lot of time confirming my exact point. And the numbers game you just played was pointless, as it has nothing to do with my initial assessment. I know that players move up the depth chart when one gets injured...HOWEVER...why give carries to someone that ordinarily would not make the team when we could give twice as many to Goodson in the meantime. BECAUSE...the Panthers expect Birmingham to be around in week 1 and maybe beyond. The only reason...there is an injury to another RB they are concerned about (Stewart). Do you understand now?

Are you serious? They damn near worked Goodson to death in that last game. Somebody had to get a few carries to give the guy a breather, and Birmingham was the only one left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodson isn't an every down back. Goodson and Birmingham is the equivalent to a second string Williams and Stewart. Goodson is NOT an every down back, and if we ever had to use him as an every down back, we're in trouble, and the coaching staff knows this. We will be keeping Birmingham, rest assured of that.

I don't doubt that we will...I am just curious if we are only keeping him for this very reason. Keeping 4 RB's is going to be hard, esp. since we will be keeping 2 kickers and 2 FB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? They damn near worked Goodson to death in that last game. Somebody had to get a few carries to give the guy a breather, and Birmingham was the only one left.

Goodson left much earlier then the rest of the starters, some of which played into the 4th quarter (entire O-line, Hoover).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just wish the man would file his paperwork for retirement so he could get the accolades he so richly deserves form the Panthers and the NFL   He is being a damned knucklehead
    • you can't turn Teddy Bridgwater into a gunslinger just because that's what you want.   It's DNA and tools.  It's pretty simple.   You can try to make the best of what you have though.  Trying to make it work, doesn't change what Teddy naturally is.  Remember, folks argued that silly one too.  But it's the same logic here.  It's like saying, you know what Jake.....let's no longer gamble.  That's over.  We are just taking the safe checkdown.  Get it out nice and quick.  Sure, it might work here or there. But eventually he gonna see 89 in triple coverage downfield and say fug it.    round pegs are round pegs.  round holes are round holes.  we have seen people trying to force them forever......but the saying exist for a reason.  They generally are what they are.   the Luke comment was just a fun nod and trying to wrap this up friendly, I was trying to largely let you off the hook on all of your very stern lectures of the Tepper era we are in.....and how horribly wrong you have been there about what was coming.  Guess you got the goldfish thing going on with all those.  I would too.  
×
×
  • Create New...