Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person: Panthers expected to sign 5 tryout players


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

Please cut Roman is ass Harper

Not yet, he's got 1 year left on his contract and hopefully he's not seeing the field by the end of the season. I honestly think Coleman will step into Romans old spot and solidify it for us, but as long as we can carry the extra weight (right now), we should hold on because you never know how many injuries we'll get in training camp. Don't worry, I don't expect Roman to be employed here next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DE Rakim Cox - Signed as n UDFA last year out of Villanova by the MinnesotaVikings.

OG Ronald Patrick - South Carolina guy. Was signed as an UDFA by the Steelers last offseason.

OG Jordan McCray - Signed by the Packers as an UDFA last year. Cut but re-signed to the practice squad. Vikings signed him to a futures contract but released him in March.

FB Lee Ward - Rookie FA out of Stanford.

TE Jamie Childers - Signed as UDFA by the Rams in 2012. He's been with three different NFL teams since 2012 - St. Louis, New York Giants and Buffalo

.

All now official, with DT Cummings as the odd man out. Roster is now at 90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...