Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I don't know how you can draw any conclusions


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

By what we've seen so far in the Preseason.

Vanilla schemes, a myriad of injuries and one of our starting defensive tackles probably isn't on the roster yet.

Beason and Stewart will be ready for game one along with a lot of other players restricted from action so far. Defensive schemes will be played in earnest. The O will have all their weapons.

Beat them stinkin' Iggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only conclusions I've drawn thus far is that a couple players we have aren't living up to expectations while a couple others are doing very well and probably surpassing most expectations. Also we need to make sure that we make those tackles and rely on the second guy getting there to strip the ball. TACKLE FIRST FOR MY BRAIN'S SAKE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a Good way to look at it;

Was there more Good than Bad???

Injuries have Killed our ability to see what our whole starting O and D would look like, plus we have shot ourselves in the foot A WHOLE DAMN BUNCH this pre-season...

I am not amused...

No. In all four games there was more bad than good. By a significant margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how you can draw any conclusions

Here is a drawing.....

scientific_method01.gif

and here is the process.. (Pay close attention to step 6)

1. Define/Identify the Problem

2. Form a Hypothesis

3. Make Observations or Test Hypothesis and Perform Experiments

4. Organize and Analyze Data

5. Do Experiments and Observations Support Hypothesis?

* If No, Perform New Experiments and Repeat Step 4

6. Draw Conclusions

7. Communicate Results

:D

pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe a bit of a homer take but I can't give us a grade lower than A.   Freeling was arguably the best LT prospect in the draft.  His athletic ability is off the chart and at 6'7" that can move.  It was a no brainer pick.   Hunter's key word is Violence. Putting him next to Brown should scare an offensive coordinator. These two give Scourton and Phillips plenty of chances to get one on one opportunities. Brazzell, another tall receiver with sprinter speed.  Our WR room is filled with tall talented WR.  Brazzell is going to give us a WR that can take to roof off the defense.  Basically Jimmy Horn with size. W. Lee III has a nickname of the Blanket. (heard this on the Beleav podcast with J. Stewart)  What a great name.  A great value in the 5th round. Hecht A strong, fast and extremely smart center. Many had him listed as the best center in the draft.  He's most likely a starter sooner than later. Wheatley A good safety in round 5.  Someone who could see playing time.   Kuwatch  I love this pick.  At minimum he will be a key piece on special teams and with some good coaching he'll see some packages where he'll play.  His down piece is he doesn't stay up in the running game.  Good coaching will fix this.  He reminds me a bit of A.J. Klein.   All these picks were great value.  I believe everyone of them were graded higher than the pick we took them.   Dan Morgan is IMO doing a great job turning this team into a good team with great depth.
    • Moton is a class act.  
    • Sure, that is possible. That’s what, an extra 55 yards a game on average and 7 more TDs? What if he’s just 15th?  I imagine they would extend him in that situation due to the belief that he’ll keep trending up. maybe a 3 year contract to prove he can be top 10? Sounds like a Tepper plan.
×
×
  • Create New...