Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Blog Entry: Week 1 "Game at a Glance"


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

I've started a new feature on my Panthers' Analysis blog.  I hope it will be a weekly feature after each game.  It's the "game at a glance" table putting the gamebook "drive summary" chart into a kind of visual format, with big plays highlighted.  Some of you will have seen the table in the week 1 Stats & Analysis thread, or the PFF Defense grade thread.  In the blog entry, however, I've not only posted the table, I've also discussed 5 take aways I get from looking at the week 1 table.

Of particular interest is a look at the anatomy of the drive where we scored our single Offensive Touchdown.  It may be "quintessential Panther's football."  No "big play" in terms of a huge gain, but a couple of big conversions on 3rd & 4th down and lots of short runs & short passes.  Really sweet.  Not the most exciting kind of football perhaps, but a great drive.

Because I know that not everyone will have time to read the full entry, let me at least post my comments on the anatomy of that TD-scoring drive, since I imagine that may be of interest to some, and it may also help alleviate at least *some* of the anxiety about our offense in the wake of Kelvin Benjamin's absence this year. 

 

3) Carolina football success does NOT NECESSARILY depend on big plays.  What's interesting to note is that Drive 5, our only offensive drive in which we scored a TD (obviously not counting Josh Norman's Pick6 TD) did not have a true "big play."  The biggest play, by the numbers, of that drive was a 17 yard pass to Ted Ginn.  Here's how the rest of it reads:

  • Start on CAR34 after a failed JAX FG attempt
  • 1) Cam run for 4 to CAR38
  • 2) Incomplete pass, penalty on JAX, 1st down. to CAR 43
  • 3) 17 yard pass to Ginn.  1st down.  JAX 40. 
  • 4) Incomplete deep pass to Cotch.
  • 5) Stewart Run for 7 yards.  JAX 33.
  • 6) 3rd & 3: 4 yard pass to Stewart.  1st down.  JAX 29.
  • 7) 5 yard pass to Fozzy.  JAX 24.
  • 8) 6 yard pass to Philly Brown.  JAX 18.  First Down.
  • 9) Fozzy run.  No Gain.  Still JAX 18.
  • 10) 6 yard pass to Tolbert.  JAX 12.
  • 11) 3rd & 4: Cam run for 3 yards.  4th & 1 at JAX 9.
  • 12) 4th & 1: Cam up the middle for 2 yards.  1st down.  JAX 7
  • 13) 7 yard pass to Cotch.  TOUCHDOWN!

So, you tell me.  Was the longest pass of the drive, the 17 yard pass to Ginn early on, the "big play" that led to scoring.  Not really.  It was great, built confidence in the passing game, got us into JAX territory, etc. etc.  But obviously the real big plays of the drive were plays 6, 12 and 13.  Stew's 3rd down conversion that kept us moving towards the red zone, Cam's 4th down push the pile forward conversion, and then the short TD throw to Cotch.

Big plays are interesting.  They do create scoring oportunities,and momentum shifts, and reveal weaknesses in an opponent's defense.  I'm looking forward to tracking them.  But they MAY not be essential in terms of how the Panthers win a game... 

Drive 5 may be textbook of how we win this year.  13 plays (counting incompletions), 5:21 off the clock, 66 yards.  No pass longer than 17 yards.  No run longer than 7 yards.  The big plays were a run of 2 yards, a pass for 4 yards, and a pass for 7 yards. 

What do you think, would you be happy to see a lot more drives like drive 5 from week 1?  Share your thoughts!

And if you have time, I'd love for folks to check out the full blog entry and to give feedback on the "game at a glance" table and any suggestions for changes or improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized we had another "scoring opportunity" that we missed that doesn't show up in the table.   In drive 7, following the complete 37 yard pass to Ginn, we actually got as far as the JAX37 yard line, within field goal range.  But we got pushed back to the JAX48 and ended up punting. 

So actually, it's interesting, we had scoring opportunities on all 5 drives where we had "big plays" - for a total of 6 total scoring opportunities, of which we got points on 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...