Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yeah, after what I just witnessed


heelsrule1988

Recommended Posts

I can't believe this, but Seattle has 3 converted Offensive Lineman?  I mean, seriously?  One use to be a TE, the others use to be DT's.  I mean, why?  

Can't afford to keep everyone. Also, trading Unger for Graham (whom it seems they cant figure out how to use properly) doesn't appear to be working out so far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hilarious how some of you are reading the first sentence and then immediately replying without reading what comes directly after that.

reply: "they can't beat us, we can only lose ourselves" is taints fan logic where they pull some bullshit stat out of their ass to say they really won or say "well if you take out this play..." in order to prove that the saints haven't lost a game since 2006. knock that off.

if/when seattle shuts this offense down, it's because they're a damn good football team and have one of the all time great defenses; easily the best in the salary cap era. not because "lol we beat ourselves if we got 150 yards we wouldve won lucky ass SUCKhawks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reply: "they can't beat us, we can only lose ourselves" is taints fan logic where they pull some bullshit stat out of their ass to say they really won or say "well if you take out this play..." in order to prove that the saints haven't lost a game since 2006. knock that off.

if/when seattle shuts this offense down, it's because they're a damn good football team and have one of the all time great defenses; easily the best in the salary cap era. not because "lol we beat ourselves if we got 150 yards we wouldve won lucky ass SUCKhawks"

I don't think the 2000 Ravens would agree with your "best defense easily in the salary cap era" comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea Seattle is that game where a FG or Punt could get blocked and of course they can run back some punts since they always seem to have a good returner...and ya know they seem to actually practice STs....I'd feel better if the Panthers came out and said they don't bother practicing STs because at least then we could do something to actually improve....if this is what we get with practice then got damn they are seriously inept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reply: "they can't beat us, we can only lose ourselves" is taints fan logic where they pull some bullshit stat out of their ass to say they really won or say "well if you take out this play..." in order to prove that the saints haven't lost a game since 2006. knock that off.

if/when seattle shuts this offense down, it's because they're a damn good football team and have one of the all time great defenses; easily the best in the salary cap era. not because "lol we beat ourselves if we got 150 yards we wouldve won lucky ass SUCKhawks"

I understand the inference OP was making by his "zero chance" comment. I tend to agree with him.

I've watched every Seattle and Panther game, and if both teams play their best football, the Panthers take this one without a doubt.

Even if Lynch is 100%, we usally hold him in check, and as of right now he's not 100% . That puts it on Wilsons shoulders to beat us, and the way the Hawks O-line is playing, I don't think RW can pull it out. If Luke is back and the way Norman is playing, I think Seattle will have a hard time scoring.

The Hawks D is still good, but not nearly as imposing as in years past. The way Cam Newton is playing, smart and efficient,  and taking what the defense gives us, the Panthers will win the time of possession battle and the game.

The only way I feel we lose Is turnovers, stupid penalties or letting Lockett run wild on returns. We can lose this game, but all things being considered I don't think Seattle can beat us this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...