Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Concept of Retribution


Razeyfingers

Recommended Posts

Why is it acceptable to tolerate excessive abuse when you have made a mistake? It is a very strange notion to think allowing people to hurt you after you have hurt someone else will make things better. The idea that you CONTINUALLY owe retribution to someone through punishing yourself, or others not involved to punish you, is ridiculous. You can make amends to set right what you did wrong, communicate it with those you hurt and try to make it right, simple. No one else needs to be involved. Beckham can call Norman any time he wants. Whats with Deon or Cam having to be involved?

 

Now that the Panthers so strongly accepted that blame for Norman and several other nonsense stories like a bat on the field, will other refs be looking to flag us early since we're so ssscaAAArry now? Will the general public be quicker to say "They brought bats on to the field and called Beckham a F****T, so yeah I can see why they got so many flags against Atlanta on Week 16"?

 

The real question is this:

Will YOU as Panthers fans be quicker to say that Norman should be flagged more often now for how he reacted to Beckham?

 

 

People who punish themselves are just losers who wallow in self pity without making things right. Have no fear though, this country is about to change A LOT. Those fools have had their time and enough of ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This coach is trying to keep his team focused and not play the NYG/NFL game of "yeah well, OBJ may have commited assualt on the field BUT Norman and the Panthers are a bunch of thugs who don't belong in the NFL s elite".

If you watch NFL network or ESPN or CBS sport or ect. They have all had the same narrative all week. Start with " OBJ is awful and should be suspended to slowly morph into : Well.....ya know....the Panthers are homophobes and thugs so maybe they got what they deserved, to ; Well fug the Panthers they are homophobes sexist and thugs and should be eliminated from the playoffs.

 

 

I say Ron's doing right , ignore and keep pounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Vampire the buffet slayer said:

This coach is trying to keep his team focused and not play the NYG/NFL game of "yeah well, OBJ may have commited assualt on the field BUT Norman and the Panthers are a bunch of thugs who don't belong in the NFL s elite".

If you watch NFL network or ESPN or CBS sport or ect. They have all had the same narrative all week. Start with " OBJ is awful and should be suspended to slowly morph into : Well.....ya know....the Panthers are homophobes and thugs so maybe they got what they deserved, to ; Well fug the Panthers they are homophobes sexist and thugs and should be eliminated from the playoffs.

 

 

I say Ron's doing right , ignore and keep pounding.

I literally watch sports all day or have it on in the background. And I've not once heard the narrative that the Panthers are thugs or homophobic.

That may be a narrative that you think is out there because the Giants wanted it to be. And maybe it is in the specific NY market. But I've not seen or heard that from a national perspective once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...