Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An observation and a question


sharkkiller

Recommended Posts

So I was on youtube and somehow ended up watching the Lionel Richie video Hello. Don't ask, it was a weird youtube trip through literal music videos and ended up there. Better than where I usually end up.

 

But anyhoo, at about 3:25 in the video, the blind girl is at home alone and Lionel calls her and says, "Hello, is it me your looking for?" and then hangs up the phone. OK, that is strange in its own right. But that is not what bugged me. My question is, why is a blind girl sitting at home in bed by herself reading a braille book with the lights on? 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkMXBJNhH48

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

1. Because with the lights off it makes for a pretty pointless music video, eh? 

2. Because she needs the light to find the book to begin with.

3. Those are camera lights and she has no idea she's in a music video.

I concede point 1. You have to have lights for the music video.

If she is blind, what good would the light do to find the book.

The light is clearly coming from a lamp that is turned on. Not camera lights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sharkkiller said:

I concede point 1. You have to have lights for the music video.

If she is blind, what good would the light do to find the book.

The light is clearly coming from a lamp that is turned on. Not camera lights.

You completely missed everything... sarcasm, irony, Airplane-type humor.... you missed it all. Talk about ruining punch lines, I'm sure you're a blast at parties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...