Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Falcons game

the greatest

By the greatest,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

If the o-line blocks well, and Jake throws multiple INTs, then he's done imo. I would start Moore or Feeley for the rest of the season. If the team quits on Jake and he remains the starter, then things will become embarrassing imo. The other players will only watch so many dead ducks wobble through the air before they start to half-ass it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FLpanfan Newbie

FLpanfan

Posted
Posted

Here's the question - what will be deemed acceptable by Delhomme this weekend? A Panther win and a few TD's with no INT's? A Panther win, but Jake plays average (1TD, 1INT for example)? Or maybe a bad game but Panthers still manage a win - does that win cure all ills? Or what if Jake has a very good game, but we lose anyway?

I'm just curious what folks determine to be an acceptable performance that will allow the following week to pass without the same QB concerns....or maybe it doesn't matter how he does, maybe you're too far gone already.....

If Jake plays average, I'll get off his back. 1 INT 1 TD is fine with me as long as we are still competitive in the game. But really it's on the O-line and coaches to step up, we all know what Jake needs to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sword Newbie

Sword

Posted
Posted

We'll never know if Matt Moore is Chris Weinke or a hidden jem until he actually starts some...we may never know if he stays on this team and doesn't get resigned though...

It would piss me off to see him being a superstar with the broncos next year though......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...