Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reminder!--must read!


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

Thanks for all the people, posters and lurkers here- we appreciate your support- but we need to remember the rules. Please read the rules and adhere to them.

I, in particular, appreciate the news sites that are linked here, but DO NOT post any entire articles unless you are the original author. Post a snipet or teaser and a link to the original source. Not doing so could cost the Huddle a lot of money on the grounds of copyright infringement.

Also, as a courtesy, don't quote a four paragraph post for a one sentence reply. It unnecessarily eats up a ton of space.

Be mindful of other posters and read the threads that are already posted before starting another one.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the people, posters and lurkers here- we appreciate your support- but we need to remember the rules. Please read the rules and adhere to them.

I, in particular, appreciate the news sites that are linked here, but DO NOT post any entire articles unless you are the original author. Post a snipet or teaser and a link to the original source. Not doing so could cost the Huddle a lot of money on the grounds of copyright infringement.

Also, as a courtesy, don't quote a four paragraph post for a one sentence reply. It unnecessarily eats up a ton of space.

Be mindful of other posters and read the threads that are already posted before starting another one.

You got it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the people, posters and lurkers here- we appreciate your support- but we need to remember the rules. Please read the rules and adhere to them.

I, in particular, appreciate the news sites that are linked here, but DO NOT post any entire articles unless you are the original author. Post a snipet or teaser and a link to the original source. Not doing so could cost the Huddle a lot of money on the grounds of copyright infringement.

Also, as a courtesy, don't quote a four paragraph post for a one sentence reply. It unnecessarily eats up a ton of space.

Be mindful of other posters and read the threads that are already posted before starting another one.

Thanks for your cooperation.

This is Kurb's original post from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, in particular, appreciate the news sites that are linked here, but DO NOT post any entire articles unless you are the original author. Post a snipet or teaser and a link to the original source. Not doing so could cost the Huddle a lot of money on the grounds of copyright infringement.

.

See, I looked all over BEFORE I posted an article and link and could not find this clearly stated. I went ahead and posted the article and link and received an angry response from you. I don't mind adhering to the rules, as long as they are clearly stated and easily available. This thread came after my post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...