Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, im just sittin'


Your Creeper Cabbie

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

"sound" is a construct that requires a listener. Without an ear and brain to process the pressure waves generated, there is no sound.

the pressure waves are generated whether there's someone there to witness it, or not. you don't have to witness or measure an event for it to happen. there's a vast universe of events constantly happening that we aren't witnessing, yet they are still happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

thats not sound though. It's pressure waves. "Sound" is the result of your eardrum vibrating due to the pressure waves which is then interpreted by the brain.

that depends on if you're a physicist or a physiologist. a physicist will say that the event of making the pressure wave is creating sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

the pressure waves are generated whether there's someone there to witness it, or not. you don't have to witness or measure an event for it to happen. there's a vast universe of events constantly happening that we aren't witnessing, yet they are still happening.

Made me think of this

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, cookinwithgas said:

Sound = force creating waves, medium carrying waves, receiver to process waves and convert to electrical impulses the brain recognizes as sound

If the wave is at 40kHz, a dog can hear it but a human cannot. Its sound for the dog but not for the human.

it's a matter of how you define sound.  A physiologist defines sound as the interpretation of the pressure wave. A physicist defines it as the creation of the wave.  My first degree is in physics, so I side with that definition.  My dad was a professor of linguistics, so he'd probably side with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have said if you out even an average QB into the offense we are averaging 25+ points a game. But that will never happen with Bryce under center. 
    • The defense is 28 out of 32 in salary cap allocation for 2025. We have a ton of resources tied up in the offense including the highest paid OL in the league multiple 1st round WR's and multiple recent draft picks across the offense at TE and RB and we have two 1000 yard backs. Bryce and company couldn't get past Tyler Shough and his crew in 2 games. That's all there is to it. You can spin it and put the entire onus on the defense to your heart's desire it doesn't change the fact that this is an OFFENSIVE team now. If you want to argue that we should revert back to a defensive identity as we have been in the past which has brought us success then I will agree with you on that. But as it stands the onus is on the offense because that is where we have invested through the nose. Dave Canales and Bryce Young need to do a hell of a lot better than they have against the rebuilding Saints who without us should only have 2 wins this season.
    • Bryce is not trending up. He is the same QB he has always been. Bottom of the league in most categories.  If Canales thinks he can build a contender with Bryce then he is a bigger idiot then I thought.  Offense next year will have the same issues and be just as inconsistent as it was this year.  We have seen Bryce’a ceiling and it is 175 yards a game and that is not a QB you keep around as your starter. That is barely a backup.   
×
×
  • Create New...