Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton: My job is not to lobby for my health


top dawg

Recommended Posts

You can't read any article about Newton without the place being littered with stupid ass remarks about the fumble recovery in SB50.

But the guy doesn't let it deter him. He ends up taking a ridiculous beating in the rematch, but still stands tall and manages to lead his team, in Mile High mind you, on a final, and what should have been a game winning drive that unfortunately ended in a missed kick. What does he get for his efforts? Yet another keyboard warrior questioning him. Good grief. People like this deserve to have to watch Jimmy Clausen take snaps behind center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheRed said:

Cam previously spoke out at one point about a ref telling him he isn't "old enough" to get a call.

He hasn't been afraid to speak up. But everytime he does, the media tries to turn it into a distraction for the team. They drilled him over the Super Bowl postgame, and he's still getting poo for it to this day. It's no surprise whatsoever that he is unwilling to give these assholes anymore fuel to attack him with.

However, it is asinine to insinuate that he is unaware, or unwilling to acknowledge/rehash this continually because he is simply not concerned enough about his health considering he and the team are currently focused on our upcoming opponent, not the Denver Broncos.

No where did I say he wasn't concerned about his health? What I said is that he should be the main lobbyist for his health, period.  When it comes to health, damn what people think.  Everyone saw what was done to Cam, and it's pretty much indefensible, so anyone in the media who would dare attempt to cast some negativity upon Cam for speaking out for himself (which of course, means that he is effectively speaking out for others) would look pretty stupid.  Like I said, if Brady, Belichick and Kraft spoke out if Brady was in a similar situation, then not only would everyone be saying they were absolutely right, but the league would take the issue more seriously.  I don't see how anyone would argue against that, unless they just want to argue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

Yes! Bitching,  whining, and complaining about people being mean to him would be the best thing to do to garner support! 

He needs to make the game about him.

 

Lol

Anyone who just thinks this is about Cam is basically just missing the point. Cam already has support. It's almost like some of you guys are holding Cam to a double standard because of what might happen---what someone in the media might say---but if Brady, Manning or Rodgers said it if they were in a similar situation, then it would be totally accepted and understandable. But, no, not Cam. He can't even say anything when he is totally in the right to do so, lest negativity rain downs upon him.

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know it would literally be accepted/praised by everyone if Rodgers, Manning, or Brady spoke out about something like this to the point it was distracting the team just a few days before a home opener?

I don't know if you've noticed, but the league isn't exactly going easy on Brady right now anyway. 

I mean, I'm not saying I don't think there is a terrible double standard operating at times in regards to the treatment Newton has received over the years, but making statements like the above as if you can see the future while acting as if other people with contrasting opinions are just misinformed is pretty pointless altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheRed said:

How do you know it would literally be accepted/praised by everyone if Rodgers, Manning, or Brady spoke out about something like this to the point it was distracting the team just a few days before a home opener?

I don't know if you've noticed, but the league isn't exactly going easy on Brady right now anyway. 

I mean, I'm not saying I don't think there is a terrible double standard operating at times in regards to the treatment Newton has received over the years, but making statements like the above as if you can see the future while acting as if other people with contrasting opinions are just misinformed is pretty pointless altogether.

Kind of hard to be misinformed about speculation and opinion.  I'm not the one trying to belittle someone else's...

I know my opinion is not crazy or outlandish, so we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...