Panthers/Vikes game could be moved.

[Matthias]

5 hours ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

Charlotte isn't too far from Clemson..what makes them think the protesters wont go there? There were people from other states participating in last night protest..

They have to release the video today to calm the waters..moving the game is futile at this point..

Hell, if I live in Clemson I wouldn't want this game in my town..

It's the rioters that messes everything up for everyone.  They wouldn't follow the game to Clemson because the actual protestors will stay in Charlotte.  The rioters lump themselves in with the protestors.  Besides, it's not the game their protesting.

[dugbug]

If it moves it's in Clemson.

[CarolinaCoolin]

5 hours ago, Louie said:

I have never lied in 19 years of being an officer about any case I have ever been involved in. If you lie once, and you are caught in a lie, you immediately lose all credibility with the department and the courts. It's not worth the risk, besides it being an immoral thing to do.

You are an exception. Not the rule. The overwhelming documentation of police misconduct and corruption proves this and is rampant throughout the country and that is exactly what people have a problem with. 

Cops can and will lie to protect their own. Happens every single day. 

And even when cops don't lie and it is blatant they killed a person unjustly NOTHING, zero repercussions happen to them. 

The system is more concerned with protecting the lives of officers then the citizens they are sworn to protect. 

 

[SportsCrazie4172]

Just saw a video on CNN from the police chief saying he doesn't see in video where victim is HOLDING or POINTING a gun..

This changes EVERYTHING!!

[therealmjl]

5 minutes ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

Just saw a video on CNN from the police chief saying he doesn't see in video where victim is HOLDING or POINTING a gun..

This changes EVERYTHING!!

Lol no- jump to conclusions much? Only hear what you want to hear much?

He said there was no angle which shows the victim's hands clearly.

The more telling story is the fact that the victim's attorney had NO COMMENT after seeing the video when asked if the victim had a gun.

[goodoleboy]

2 minutes ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

Just saw a video on CNN from the police chief saying he doesn't see in video where victim is HOLDING or POINTING a gun..

This changes EVERYTHING!!

I watched his interview this morning. He said the gun was clearly visible and the suspect was holding it. He said the video did not provide evidence that he pointed it at officers but it corroborated there side of the story.

Anyone but me think a person who starts a viral video with explosive false content should be charged with inciting a riot? 

[SportsCrazie4172]

Just now, mjligon said:

Lol no- jump to conclusions much? Only hear what you want to hear much?

He said there was no angle which shows the victim's hands clearly.

The more telling story is the fact that the victim's attorney had NO COMMENT after seeing the video when asked if the victim had a gun.

How am I jumping to conclusions from what the actual police chief said what I just wrote. On Wednesday the police stated he had a gun and pointed at the officer according to the video..now today they can't tell..

 

[therealmjl]

1 minute ago, goodoleboy said:

I watched his interview this morning. He said the gun was clearly visible and the suspect was holding it. He said the video did not provide evidence that he pointed it at officers but it corroborated there side of the story.

Anyone but me think a person who starts a viral video with explosive false content should be charged with inciting a riot? 

EXACTLY.

 

Yes - the woman that started the viral video should be charged. She acted ridiculous spewing out false claims, and now they are backtracking. 

The victim's stories have changed constantly---the police department's stance has stayed the same.

[therealmjl]

Just now, SportsCrazie4172 said:

How am I jumping to conclusions from what the actual police chief said what I just wrote. On Wednesday the police stated he had a gun and pointed at the officer according to the video..now today they can't tell..

 

They cant tell if he was pointing the gun or just holding it. 

 

HE HAD A GUN.

[therealmjl]

" WSOC reports the family viewed the video Thursday afternoon. The family's attorney said there is no timeline on when they'll comment on the video. When asked if the video supports police reports, the family attorney had no comment. "

 

No comment? Really?

[SportsCrazie4172]

3 minutes ago, goodoleboy said:

I watched his interview this morning. He said the gun was clearly visible and the suspect was holding it. He said the video did not provide evidence that he pointed it at officers but it corroborated there side of the story.

Anyone but me think a person who starts a viral video with explosive false content should be charged with inciting a riot? 

and I'm telling you I JUST saw a video on CNN where he gave an interview to them and he stated there wasn't indefinitive evidence that the victim had a gun or even pointed a gun..He couldn't see Mr. Scott's hands.

 

[Vikesfan]

7 minutes ago, mjligon said:

They cant tell if he was pointing the gun or just holding it. 

 

HE HAD A GUN.

Not against the law.

[Vikesfan]

3 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I've been keeping my nose clean of this entire situation but I need to chime in here:

Eye witnesses testimony is some of the LEAST accurate and unreliable forms of evidence in any and all investigations.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/

http://www.simplypsychology.org/eyewitness-testimony.html

Those are a few links that explain why. This is why I am for Cameras on police officers. If they wear a camera it has the ability to remove all bias and misinformation from events that unfold. Not only can it help prove that cops were acting crooked, it can also help exonerate officers in the event they were acting according to protocol.

When this kind of stuff happens I don't take any eye witness accounts as gospel. I wait for the film/tape to come out. 

Aren't police accounts eyewitness accounts?

[therealmjl]

12 minutes ago, Vikesfan said:

Not against the law.

LOL. N1!!!!