Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My New Toy


Kyle82

Recommended Posts

I like.Very nice car.but it looks like theres no room for a taller person

they are fine when riding up front. the rear seats aren't good for anything but kids though. I'm 6' 2", and had a 3rd gen camaro until i got my first bike. they sit the driver/passenger down very low so you get all the leg/head room you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell you what, with the new Camaro, the best production Mustang ever, and the new Challenger (my dream car, in B5 blue), now is a great time to buy American. It's good to see American Muscle hasn't gone the way of the dodo bird.

There is this guy in my neighborhood with a new orange Challenger....that is definitely my new dream car as well. I get a boner every time I see it ride by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of the three, I have to admit a bias for the Challenger. I owned a 73 Charger as a teen (until Dad took it away for getting 3 speeding tickets in 6 months) and the 72 Challenger in the HS parking lot was the only other car that made me jealous.

That Camaro looks pretty sweet though.

The Mustang is a lot, lot better than the last iteration - I drove a convertible as a rental a couple of years ago and liked it just fine. My friend has a Bullitt version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cousin got a new Challenger in matte black. Lucky dude. He compared it to a boat, "comfortable but somewhat 'disconnected' from the road." Funny guy. But he said it's a straight line beast. If he sounds negative, my family has been in the Detroit auto industry since the late 1800s and they're just hypercritical of everything with 4 wheels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cousin got a new Challenger in matte black. Lucky dude. He compared it to a boat, "comfortable but somewhat 'disconnected' from the road." Funny guy. But he said it's a straight line beast. If he sounds negative, my family has been in the Detroit auto industry since the late 1800s and they're just hypercritical of everything with 4 wheels.

Thats the feeling i get from the new Challengers..huge cruisers.

but i know a guy with one of those 67 eleanor Mustangs from Gone in 60 sec..very nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the feeling i get from the new Challengers..huge cruisers.

but i know a guy with one of those 67 eleanor Mustangs from Gone in 60 sec..very nice

zomgerzzz!!!11!1 I saw one of those in Detroit at this years Woodward Dream cruise. Shot in my pants...twice.

Snapped a picture of it:

post-303-133194769488_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really. It all depends upon perspective. You can draft quality OTs high every year. They have one of the lowest bust rates by position. DTs, less so, but good ones still come along at a regular clip. With WRs, it's simply best to draft one in the first round if you want a legit play maker. Moreover, WR is going to set you back more than OT or DT at really all statuses, meaning JAG receivers are going to make more than JAG OTs and DTs, and elite receivers will make substantially more than elite OTs or DTs. I would also argue that it's much harder to find a franchise level OT or DT that can have an altering impact upon the game. So, if you don't believe they can, you may as well wait for day 2 or 3. That's why sticking to your board is probably the wisest thing to do. If you're not committed that the value is there, then what are you doing? Lastly, I don't think you should necessarily draft in a vacuum, but you must look at each team from year to year. People want to make them the same, but they're different. You have to start over every year and identify where the strengths and weaknesses are. You can't say, "Well we drafted [so and so] last year or two years ago, so we'll just draft this this year." That's not realistic and it can be highly counterproductive, especially in light of the reason that you should be trying to use FA to set up the draft.
    • If you read through his stuff, he's had a raging hate-boner for the Carolina Panthers the likes of which would make many long-tenured Huddlers blush. Every win was "yeah but" and every loss was "see I told you so".
    • Let me preface this by saying I've read WalterFootball on and off for 20 years. That's an indictment on my decision-making, and it's more than fair to be questioned.  However, the days of reading what's become weak ragebait have drawn to a close after he re-graded the 2025 NFL Draft's first round. He gave T-Mac a C on draft night. What was his re-grade for the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?  Carolina Panthers: Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona – C Grade One-Year Grade: C+ Grade Tetairoa McMillan won Offensive Rookie of the Year, but only by default after Emeka Egbuka vanished in the second half of the season. McMillan was good, and was certainly limited by Bryce Young’s mediocrity, but there are still concerns about his work ethic and passion for football. If he doesn’t progress in the coming years, we’ll know why. Original Write-up: Wow, our Panthers source did not pan out for once. Jalon Walker was heavy chalk to go here, but the Panthers decided to draft a No. 1 receiver instead. While this fills a need, I’m concerned with Tetairoa McMillan’s work ethic, which is something you never want to hear from a first-round prospect, especially one who is chosen in the top 10. Bryce Young needs this, and McMillan is talented, but will he give 100 percent at the next level? Also, what about the defense, which was the worst in the NFL last year? https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades2025.php
×
×
  • Create New...