Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera should be on the hotseat


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, h0llywood said:

So the team loses a game where the WR has an all world game. 

Still saying, turn in your fan card and go follow another team.

It is ridiculous to think you have to stop being a fan of a team because you have different outlooks than someone else.  These are the facts: this is about to be his fourth losing season in six years, there's been a steep dropoff in the team this year, and Rivera constantly looks lost and fails to make proper adjustments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

It is ridiculous to think you have to stop being a fan of a team because you have different outlooks than someone else.  These are the facts: this is about to be his fourth losing season in six years, there's been a steep dropoff in the team this year, and Rivera constantly looks lost and fails to make proper adjustments

Its ridiculous that you have more emotional impulse than my wife on her period.

The team is dominated from top to bottom and we have a chance to tie the game. 

Ron has lost 5 games since last year, i cant imagine what you will start demanding if we miss the playoffs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

NFL teams in 2016 might have been a bit slow in catching up to Rivera's preferred Stone Age offense and defense.

But they have.

Does Rivera have it in him to at least advance to the Bronze Age?

Or is he still going to insist on carrying around his club?  "Ugh we win on ground ugh!"

Gettleman is the one drafting the players for his  scheme,  Of course we need another DT who can help protect Cam's blindside. We should have drafted Hunter Henry and we would have been 4-0 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...