Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marshall Faulk thinks Cam's no calls are retribution for Cam Calling out Ed Hoculi


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

So, did Marshall Faulk bring this up again today because I found an article where he talked about this back on September 18th. I hope he keeps mentioning it every Sunday.

 

Quote

"I think we need to put the referees on high alert in this game with Carolina and San Francisco, with these calls against Cam Newton that they are not making," Faulk said on NFL Gameday Morning. "Understand what is going on: Since 2011, Cam Newton had the most — the most, 22 — roughing the passer calls. That incident happened with Ed Hochuli, and he (Newton) told (the public) and said this is what he said to Ed, and Ed said something different.

"Last season," Faulk continued, "Cam went the whole season — zero! I mean, zero calls! Zero roughing the passer calls all of last season since that incident with Hochuli. I'm not saying they're connected. I'm not saying it's a conspiracy. I'm just saying."

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/cam-newton-spat-ref-no-faulk-article-1.2796891?utm_content=buffer359bd&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDNSports+Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

So, did Marshall Faulk bring this up again today because I found an article where he talked about this back on September 18th. I hope he keeps mentioning it every Sunday.

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/cam-newton-spat-ref-no-faulk-article-1.2796891?utm_content=buffer359bd&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDNSports+Twitter

I like Marshall for always stating the obvious. Everyone is still trying to turn a blind eye like Cam gets every single call, even ones that shouldn't be. I totally agree that Marshall should mention it every week. I also think the organization should mention it every week, but that may be too much to ask for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have without question one of the worst QB rooms in the league and your key concern is people having the audacity to be talking about it lol.
    • I saw this list crossing the screen waiting for any Panther.  Chubba, JC Horn and Hunt.  It was a crime to see so many that were not as good as these three.  ESPN is garbage anyhow.
    • Bingo!  We are on the same page.  Our scouting department was average under Hurney, but at least we hit hit it out of the park with our first rounders.  Our scouting department under Tepper's reign with his revolving doors of HCs and GMs has sucked because the scouts largely stay in place.  One or two may change every few years, but the core philosophy stays in place and I believe that to be heavily RAS influenced.    Looking the part of a football player (physical/athletic measurables) vastly outweighs putting on the tape and deep diving into his stats with our scouting department. Until we change that mindset, this team is doomed. Again, how many of us Huddlers (none of us are professional scouts) wanted McConkey over Legette? Yet, we went with XL.  Why?  RAS score, pure and simple.  If you put on the tape and look at the numbers without taking RAS into account, McConkey was the clear choice.
×
×
  • Create New...