Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case For John Ross in the 1st Round


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, SOJA said:

Love the theory but I think it's the wrong player: I'm starting to warm up to the idea of Corey Davis at number 8. 

I know we need a safety and a defensive end, but frankly I'm not sold on Adams and Hooker is more of a FS and I'm not sold on Barnett either. 

Williams reminds me of a better version of KB.

Dalvin Cook looks like he has the vision of Trent Richardson. 

My top picks right now at number 8:

1. Davis

2. Adams

3. Hooker

4. Barnett

5. Williams

6. Fournette

 

Very high chance at least three or if not all of those players will be there when we draft. 

I am too warming up to Davis. 

Lets say Adams, Hooker and Fournette are all gone... It might not be so far fetched. 

The Senior Bowl will be HUGE for Davis' draft stock. It'll be nice to see him against some better talent.

Also agree with the Cook statement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we decide to get another receiver in the 4th-5th round range I like Ryan Switzer. Made his name as a PR then became a polished receiver with 96 receptions his senior season. If you look at some of the best slot receivers in the NFL like Julian Edelman,Doug Baldwin, Wes Welker (past) they were solid returners because they had short area quickness. This offense needs a guy that can work inside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, gmonjimbo said:

If you watch this game against NC State he does a good job of using headfakes and setting his opponent off balance. 

I really like Switzer as a mid rounder for the slot.  Could use some more players that create separation.  A name to keep an eye on that might start rising now is Carlos Henderson for LA Tech.  Not much out there yet because he declared early, but speedy with tons of production as a receiver and returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...