Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Robinson at RT?


EightyNine

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

The difference was that Humphries was in play at pick 30, not 8. I'd put Cam in play at 30, depending on how the board falls. At # 8 I feel obligated to draft a perennial pro-bowler or at least gamble on who we expect to be), because I hope to hell we never draft this early again! 

Idk man.  I get your point here. 

As a fan base we have been POUNDING the table for help at OT.  I get the obligation completely believe me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Now, come up with a rational argument against anything I said. Maybe you could get that guy from the other site to help get your thoughts on order?

 

"OT's are usually bad out of Alabama.  therefore we should never consider an OT from Alabama"

 

you should do a quick google search on "logical fallacies" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Devin said:

 

"OT's are usually bad out of Alabama.  therefore we should never consider an OT from Alabama"

 

you should do a quick google search on "logical fallacies" 

   Maybe you should try to refute it if it's so easy. Not just OTs. All of them. Find me one. That has got to raise a huge red flag for such a successful program. Quit avoiding the issue. Discuss it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Quit avoiding the issue

The issue is your thought process.  Stop attacking a straw man.  I'm not arguing that Alabama hasn't had a great history of producing OL talent.   I'm arguing that to hold the school a kid went to against a prospect on an evaluation standpoint is ignorant.  I can guarantee you that the GM is spending resources scouting and vetting this young man and don't give a poo about the history of alabama's OT's coming out of draft.   We done talking in circles yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Devin said:

The issue is your thought process.  Stop attacking a straw man.  I'm not arguing that Alabama hasn't had a great history of producing OL talent.   I'm arguing that to hold the school a kid went to against a prospect on an evaluation standpoint is ignorant.  I can guarantee you that the GM is spending resources scouting and vetting this young man and don't give a poo about the history of alabama's OT's coming out of draft.   We done talking in circles yet?

   I guess. I can opinion from me....that he's a guard or RT at best. This is an opinion that seems to be widely shared, as I stated using Mayock. Also, added a caveat that EVERY OL from that school has been a disappointment. 

  You gave your opinion, and backed it up with a random guy.  Guess that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snake said:

McCaffrey is the new back in the NFL. See what the Pats did in the SB if you need to understand what I'm saying.

Pats would have lost if ATL ran the ball 2 more times, I like McCaffrey but I would prefer Fournette.

2 possible outcomes

1 Fournette

2. McCaffrey

3. Leggett

 

1.OJ Howard

2. McFaffrey

FA: Alfred Morris

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Toomers said:

This is an opinion that seems to be widely shared, as I stated using Mayock. Also, added a caveat that EVERY OL from that school has been a disappointment. 

  You gave your opinion, and backed it up with a random guy.  Guess that's it.

I don't understand the foundations of your arguments.   So in your world widely shared opinions are the only opinions worth having... and only popular people say the things worth believing?  

 

that's all I got for you bro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Devin said:

I don't understand the foundations of your arguments.   So in your world widely shared opinions are the only opinions worth having... and only popular people say the things worth believing?  

 

that's all I got for you bro. 

    What do you want? You come and make a post and expect no one to disagree? Especially with a take like that. Did you think everyone was just going to change their minds because you made a post, and say you're so smart. Surely, you had a better argument than this other guy says I'm right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...