Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thinking of joining the military


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

You don't want to know. I failed at three marriages while I was in. Not that big a deal for me, but I went into each of them with a clear understanding that I'm gone a lot and while they all said they could handle it, it was exceptionally stressful, and when reality set in, it was a different story. This was before internet, cell phones, etc. When I left home, I typically wouldn't be able to call home and talk to my family until 4 weeks later from the Philippines or Japan. You could go weeks without mail and, during one deployment, we did 145 straight days at sea- no mail, no phones... I think it's much easier now because communication is pretty routine and regular.  

I'm sorry to hear that Anybody. As FuFu said, this is one of my biggest concerns. Im grateful that I don't have a woman in my life right now, but within my first term of service, I hope to change that. But with my skill set, I don't think I'd be any better off in the Army. I'm gonna be gone alot no matter what. Maybe I should do the Air Force and try to work in cyber warfare/defense or intelligence. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

You don't want to know. I failed at three marriages while I was in. Not that big a deal for me, but I went into each of them with a clear understanding that I'm gone a lot and while they all said they could handle it, it was exceptionally stressful, and when reality set in, it was a different story. This was before internet, cell phones, etc. When I left home, I typically wouldn't be able to call home and talk to my family until 4 weeks later from the Philippines or Japan. You could go weeks without mail and, during one deployment, we did 145 straight days at sea- no mail, no phones... I think it's much easier now because communication is pretty routine and regular.  

Yeah, that is why I got out when I did (after my second enlistment).  Got married, wife was pregnant and I didn't want to be like so many others who missed so many important dates in their family lives.  Fortunately, it worked out very well both from a family and financial perspective for me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I'm sorry to hear that Anybody. As FuFu said, this is one of my biggest concerns. Im grateful that I don't have a woman in my life right now, but within my first term of service, I hope to change that. But with my skill set, I don't think I'd be any better off in the Army. I'm gonna be gone alot no matter what. Maybe I should do the Air Force and try to work in cyber warfare/defense or intelligence. Thoughts?

All branches of the service do cyber defense/warfare and intelligence.  I was an intel analyst in the Navy, and parlayed it into a career as a information security analyst in the financial industry.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

All branches of the service do cyber defense/warfare and intelligence.  I was an intel analyst in the Navy, and parlayed it into a career as a information security analyst in the financial industry.  

That's kinda my goal as well. Only with foreign language interpretation lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

@Chimera and @NanuqoftheNorth, what branch did you guys serve in? if Navy, the following question applies to you...

@Davidson Deac II, @cookinwithgas, @Anybodyhome... could you guys give me some info on what ship life is like? pros and cons. ive narrowed my choice down to the Army or Navy, and it may sound simple, but the question im trying to answer for myself is whether i will be able to handle ship life. 

I answered from the Army perspective because that's what I know.

I haven't ever lived it, but I imagine the ship life would be cool for about a week. After that, you're around the same people, in the same environment, looking at the same endless ocean. Personally, that would drive me insane.

I don't know your overall end goal, but I figured I would throw in a lot of the cons of going Army. One of the pros (if you go as a linguist) would be that you will most likely be working with operators - you'll see cool poo that gets taken out of movies because no one thinks its realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chimera said:

I answered from the Army perspective because that's what I know.

I haven't ever lived it, but I imagine the ship life would be cool for about a week. After that, you're around the same people, in the same environment, looking at the same endless ocean. Personally, that would drive me insane.

I don't know your overall end goal, but I figured I would throw in a lot of the cons of going Army. One of the pros (if you go as a linguist) would be that you will most likely be working with operators - you'll see cool poo that gets taken out of movies because no one thinks its realistic.

I think this is the opposite of what he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, h0llywood said:

I think this is the opposite of what he wants.

Yes, I've gathered this from his posts. I said he'd work with operators, not be one.

Besides, someone who wants to be in the military and not do military things should have someone help reevaluate goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chimera said:

Yes, I've gathered this from his posts. I said he'd work with operators, not be one.

Besides, someone who wants to be in the military and not do military things should have someone help reevaluate goals.

But, what about the education? 

Seriously though, with the way the world is going, this fight is going beyond the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Chimera said:

I answered from the Army perspective because that's what I know.

I haven't ever lived it, but I imagine the ship life would be cool for about a week. After that, you're around the same people, in the same environment, looking at the same endless ocean. Personally, that would drive me insane.

I don't know your overall end goal, but I figured I would throw in a lot of the cons of going Army. One of the pros (if you go as a linguist) would be that you will most likely be working with operators - you'll see cool poo that gets taken out of movies because no one thinks its realistic.

I had the pleasure (and I use the term pleasure sarcastically), of spending a couple of weeks in the field with some Rangers and Marines.  IMO, shipboard life was paradise compared to that.  But to each his own I guess.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I had the pleasure (and I use the term pleasure sarcastically), of spending a couple of weeks in the field with some Rangers and Marines.  IMO, shipboard life was paradise compared to that.  But to each his own I guess.  

Yeah, I'm definitely a "field type." I'd rather be blinded by my own sweat and have salt stains on my shirt than go cross eyed at a computer monitor and have my butt print impressed onto a chair.

Going to the field with Rangers and Marines can be good and bad. I mean, they both have great "can do" attitudes and want to continue no matter what. But Rangers have some serious fuging egos that make no one want to work with them. You have to babysit Marines to keep them from eating crayons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chimera said:

Yeah, I'm definitely a "field type." I'd rather be blinded by my own sweat and have salt stains on my shirt than go cross eyed at a computer monitor and have my butt print impressed onto a chair.

Going to the field with Rangers and Marines can be good and bad. I mean, they both have great "can do" attitudes and want to continue no matter what. But Rangers have some serious fuging egos that make no one want to work with them. You have to babysit Marines to keep them from eating crayons.

Yeah, and I would rather have air condition and hot meals/showers.  Plus I managed to parlay my tech background into a pretty nice career outside of the military. :)

 

Fwiw, though, when I was in (late Reagan era), computers were somewhat of a novelty on a ship.  For most of the sailors on board at the time, sitting at a desk was a rare luxury.  Most of the work (even when deployed) revolved around maintaining the ship, and practicing for combat or emergencies such as fire or flooding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for the record, i know that no matter which branch i join, i know i will be doing military stuff @Chimera lol. and i dont have a problem with that. but if i can avoid as much of it as possible, thats also quite alright with me. i'll do as im told and try to cope with whatever comes, but who wouldnt want to make their life alittle easier and less dangerous if given the choice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...