Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty takes blame for the pick6...


j2sgam

Recommended Posts

...from CarolinaGrowl via PFT

"Jake was expecting me to cross his face," Smith said, per Steve Reed of CarolinaGrowl.com. "I should have crossed his face and I didn't cross his face. I put Jake in a bad situation. I second-guessed my route and I shouldn't have. The bottom line is that I screwed Jake."

link...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...from CarolinaGrowl via PFT

link...

Holy crap, he even used my words...he really did screw Jake. Of course, it was so obvious that he had no choice but to admit it though.

I say again, the vast majority of Jake's INT's have come when he targets Steve Smith. Somebody needs to step up and take the pressure off of those two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i seen that in the observer......i think it was a option route bc if it wasnt newman knew the play the entire time....... he played inside,jumped inside.slash said this mouring that jake should have went to the other side of the field.

There is no way in hell that was an option route, because Jake threw that ball about 2 seconds after the snap. He fully expected Smith to be inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way in hell that was an option route, because Jake threw that ball about 2 seconds after the snap. He fully expected Smith to be inside.

which proves the point that slash made.....why throw it to a triple covered guy.plus if a croner plays to the inside why would you even think about throwing a slant with the corner right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which proves the point that slash made.....why throw it to a triple covered guy.plus if a croner plays to the inside why would you even think about throwing a slant with the corner right there.

:rolleyes:IF Smitty had run the slant like he was supposed to, he would have been inside the corner. And I don't know where the hell you're getting triple coverage from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the lb rolled over to smith, and newman had saftey help.it was no way in hell he was going to catch that ball.look at newmans interview he said i was playing the inside, and got lucky.he wasnt expecting jake to actually throw it to inside.so thats were its coming from,i dont talk out my ass like some other posters son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the lb rolled over to smith, and newman had saftey help.it was no way in hell he was going to catch that ball.look at newmans interview he said i was playing the inside, and got lucky.he wasnt expecting jake to actually throw it to inside.so thats were its coming from,i dont talk out my ass like some other posters son.

There was no LBer in on that play. It was a quick slant, hence the ball was thrown quickly, but Smitty ran the wrong route...everybody saw that but you, apparently.

And what the hell is it with you kids trying to put me down by calling me son? Don't' you know how ridiculous that is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no LBer in on that play. It was a quick slant, hence the ball was thrown quickly, but Smitty ran the wrong route...everybody saw that but you, apparently.

And what the hell is it with you kids trying to put me down by calling me son? Don't' you know how ridiculous that is?

it was a lb in on that play go look at the tape brooking was there. i just seen it on espn from the sky view and dallas coverage was to were ever smitty went. yes i know smith ran the wrong route but when you have a corner playing inside and a lb there why the fug are you going to still try to put it in there.smitty and delhomme are not on the same page.......and im not a muthfuging kid,i wasn't putting you down.so get ya mind right!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was a lb in on that play go look at the tape brooking was there. i just seen it on espn from the sky view and dallas coverage was to were ever smitty went. yes i know smith ran the wrong route but when you have a corner playing inside and a lb there why the f*ck are you going to still try to put it in there.smitty and delhomme are not on the same page.......and im not a muthf*cking kid,i wasn't putting you down.so get ya mind right!!!!!!!!

I just saw it too...the LBer was coming that way, but when the ball got there, he wasn't a factor at all. And if you just saw it, then you heard from the 3rd or 4th different former NFL coach and/or QB say that it was a quick slant that Smitty screwed up. It's not complicated.

BTW the part I just bolded is classic. Using childish language to proclaim your manhood. That's beautiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we lose tomorrow we’d have to sweep the Bucs in order to get into the playoffs. With a loss tomorrow the Bucs would then hold the tie breaker if we finished tied If we can’t split with NO then we sure as hell not sweeping Tampa It’s win or go home tomorrow in my eyes  Biggest game since 2017 playoff game imo  
    • Grok AI: No, there are no credible reports that the Carolina Hurricanes offered Jake Guentzel the same contract terms as Tampa Bay (7 years, $63 million total, $9 million AAV) before he signed with the Lightning. Reliable sources, including The Athletic, consistently reported that Carolina’s offer during negotiations was an eight-year deal worth $64 million ($8 million AAV). Guentzel did not accept it promptly, leading the Hurricanes to trade his negotiating rights to Tampa Bay on June 30, 2024, for a 2025 third-round pick. He then quickly signed the 7x$9M deal with the Lightning on July 1, 2024. Guentzel himself later reflected (in 2025 interviews) that staying in Carolina was his initial preference, but negotiations stalled and “didn’t work out,” with Tampa’s opportunity becoming a “no-brainer.” No reports from outlets like ESPN, NHL.com, or insiders (e.g., Elliotte Friedman, Pierre LeBrun, Frank Seravalli) indicate Carolina ever matched or offered the Lightning’s exact terms—total money, AAV, or length. The extra year was Carolina’s key advantage, but they reportedly stuck closer to $8M AAV and moved on when Guentzel explored options.
    • Key matchups for Panthers vs. Saints in Week 15 Panthers QB Bryce Young vs. Saints' secondary Panthers' pass rush vs. Saints' offensive line Panthers HC Dave Canales vs. Saints DC Brandon Staley https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/12/13/panthers-saints-2025-key-matchups-week-15/87739383007/
×
×
  • Create New...