Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle | Luke Wilson trade?


Ace_Aladdin

Trade  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Trade Seattle for Luke Wilson

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, sanjay_rajput said:

We did it with Greg Olsen and I would say that was a homerun

This was a once in a blue moon stars aligned type scenario.  Greg was not going to be used in the Chicago offense and Hurney was able to capitalize.  I dont think you can exactly bottle that formula and expect it to work on a whim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

This was a once in a blue moon stars aligned type scenario.  Greg was not going to be used in the Chicago offense and Hurney was able to capitalize.  I dont think you can exactly bottle that formula and expect it to work on a whim.

Nobody is saying giving up 2nd rounder but using low round picks wouldn't be a failed trade for known commodity.

Hell Gettleman traded a 4th rounder for a Punter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Nobody is saying giving up 2nd rounder but using low round picks wouldn't be a failed trade for known commodity.

Hell Gettleman traded a 4th rounder for a Punter.

Oh I'd give a next year 2nd for Wilson. No problem as long as it was the only part of the deal. This dude is the real deal. Plus we all know Hurney sucks at anything after the first round pick. But even if it was still Gettlemagic I'd still say try and get him for a second.  

I do not understand to this day why the Seahawks brought Jimmy Graham in with this guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Oh I'd give a next year 2nd for Wilson. No problem as long as it was the only part of the deal. This dude is the real deal. Plus we all know Hurney sucks at anything after the first round pick. But even if it was still Gettlemagic I'd still say try and get him for a second.  

I do not understand to this day why the Seahawks brought Jimmy Graham in with this guy.  

I think 2nd round would be too steep even 3rd round  but a 4th packaged with 6th or 7th round would be ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sanjay_rajput said:

I think 2nd round would be too steep even 3rd round  but a 4th packaged with 6th or 7th round would be ideal.

Ya but I highly doubt Seattle would go for that. I'd rather have a plug and play replacement for Greg than try and pick up a TE in the draft in the next couple years and have to develop them while GO is being(and I don't mean no disrespect because GO has been 1/3 our offense since he got here.) but an old man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ya but I highly doubt Seattle would go for that. I'd rather have a plug and play replacement for Greg than try and pick up a TE in the draft in the next couple years and have to develop them while GO is being(and I don't mean no disrespect because GO has been 1/3 our offense since he got here.) but an old man. 

I'm down for Luke Wilson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sunday ticket is $5 as well
    • Or if you're going to bet the farm on a small guy who will get rocked by NFL players on a regular basis he better be special. That's what I heard. Regardless, him being vague about it is kind of my point. Few in the media raised any concerns about Bryce's game outright. His passing ability was highly praised across the board even after Stroud had the more impressive Pro Day. There was the dumb debate around batted balls that eventually got squashed and I remember some game tape blogger types talking about his poor footwork, but even that was hand-waved away because he was a "dynamic playmaker" and we had a respected coaching staff that could fix him.
    • Seems to me that the Bucs have less fight in them now than they had in week 16. The real test is going to be if the Panthers can sustain focus and discipline throughout. With the Bucs being at home, maybe that gives them a little boost of confidence and energy.  Wouldn’t it be something if for ONCE the Panthers came out and dominated from the opening snap and just took this shook Bucs team to task?  If the Panthers see-saw form follows, we are in line for the W. Hard to say we have momentum but we do have a pretty clear pattern of following a loss with a win.  I’m going to say 24-16 Panthers!!
×
×
  • Create New...