Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton on McCaffrey’s Use


dldove77

Recommended Posts

I actually think Newton does a good job here of presenting the different looks Shula put McCaffrey in on Sunday. Would have preferred to see gifs instead of pics, though.  

Does it matter if not much comes of it? Is too much made of the amount of time opposing coordinators spend preparing for a specific player?

Going to have to see it pay off in an important game. 

It’s worth a read.

http://www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/27248/a-snapshot-of-all-the-ways-the-panthers-use-rookie-christian-mccaffrey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Ugh... ESPN needs a new reporter. I see his name and instantly skip. 

I understand the sentiment, but OP is right. While it would have benefited from Gifs, it's a decent read, at best a bit light on analysis, but at worst, it's a feel good piece with a lot of positive things to say about Cam and 22. He even makes it sound like Shula is getting it to some extent. Beats the hell out of the doom and gloom around here this week, especially when I just scored a pair of free clubs for Sunday! Pump me up even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, xav8tor said:

I understand the sentiment, but OP is right. While it would have benefited from Gifs, it's a decent read, at best a bit light on analysis, but at worst, it's a feel good piece with a lot of positive things to say about Cam and 22. He even makes it sound like Shula is getting it to some extent. Beats the hell out of the doom and gloom around here this week, especially when I just scored a pair of free clubs for Sunday! Pump me up even more.

But he's so bad. So bad. If I'm saying that. It means something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was a good read and not a bad analysis. Right now, with CMC, defensive coordinators have two ways of going at it: guard the heck out of him because of his potential, or look at him as a big, noisy distraction that isn't exactly lighting up the scoreboard. If they go with option 1, the rest of the Panthers offense gets major opportunities throughout the game. If they go with option 2, sooner or later they will get burned badly.

Option 3 is probably to just designate a spy for him to follow him on each play, just like they used to do with Cam. Of course, once they do that, we might see that Cam's still got some of the old razzle dazzle left in his running game.

The best teams offer a "pick your poison" opportunity like this. It's nice to be one of those teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there might have been over 1,000 posts on the huddle about how we shouldn't draft CMC because we wouldn't be able to use him properly. With the right team and right coaches CMC could blow up the league. On this team it depends on if our O-line can push around the opposing teams D-line as to how well CMC will do from game to game. We can push the Saints around, so expect a good day for CMC. But you're right back to the same problem when we face a tough D-line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...