Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

well, currently in philly...(playoff thoughts and rambling)


Saca312

Recommended Posts

the eagles clearly are bad without wentz. nick foles is a statue and bad at playing qb. even doug peterson can't save him.

their secondary is also a turnstile. just simply pretending you're doing a double move will probably send their ankles to asia or something. they spin like tops on the field. this team is clearly not a threat.

with that being said, there's a lot to say about how key a good qb is for the playoffs. while jared goff is clearly having the year of his life, most of that can be attributed to mcvay being the eyes for his qb and basically calling the plays as early as he can. theoretically, luke could easily counter in the 15 seconds the rams have to shut off the connection with mcvay with goff likely unable to counter.

as for the rest, you have case keenum who's shown to be bad against our defense, and then drew brees and matt ryan/russell wilson. clearly put, our biggest competition will be the saints if we have to face them.

however, we could just as easily find ourselves en route through the rams and eagles to the playoffs with a rams loss to the 49ers. 

so, just think on that a moment. i'm sort of just jotting down my thoughts, but we could have a pretty easy path until the nfc championship if the dominoes fall the right way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

Most likely first opponent is Aints and I think once we get past them, we're SB bound.

if the 49ers win it's guaranteed we won't face the saints first. 

it's very plausable considering the fight those two teams had the first time, and that's despite the 49ers having hoyer.

when kyle shanahan has his qb, he can orchestrate a masterpiece, and so far it's working with jimmy g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not gonna lie, the idea of having to face the Saints in the dome in the forst round of the playoffs sucks ass. I get all this talk about ot being hard to beat the same team three times in one season, but they've straight handled us twice. They just look like an awful match up for us this year.

which is why we pretty much have to hope the 49ers win against the rams which is actually pretty lucky.

reminder, they're the same team that hung 44 on arguably the best defense of this decade in jacksonville. better than the '15 broncos for sure.

DRnU9ooW0AE_JQi.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherNation123 said:

Yeah I definitely like the Rams/Eagles path better; however, I think we are the team no one wants to face (including the Saints).  I've got faith in Cam and that our D will improve on it's subpar performances the past couple of weeks

i mean i agree our second game against them was completely us shooting ourselves in the foot, but even at full power i wonder if we'd be enough to dethrone the saints.

would be a massive shootout imo if we have to face them. 50/50 either way. at our best i know we can compete and possibly win, but i can't say that for certain since they match us so well.

every other nfc team im confident we can handle quite well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherNation123 said:

Yeah I definitely like the Rams/Eagles path better; however, I think we are the team no one wants to face (including the Saints).  I've got faith in Cam and that our D will improve on it's subpar performances the past couple of weeks

Can we get to the super bowl if cmc is the lead back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

if the 49ers win it's guaranteed we won't face the saints first. 

You 100% sure about that? I don't feel like diving too far into that but I'm somewhat skeptical. If, we lose, Aints lose and Rams lose wouldn't we play the Aints? I'll take your word for it though. If so, then we really should root for the 49ers. Aints lose first round and we should be able to beat the Rams in LA which is basically a neutral field. Would be a nice first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are going to keep wishing we don’t play the Saints and really play the Rams and we get bent over with no Vaseline. 

Id rather put the positive juju on the team,.. we are Super Bowl Champs, Our offense scores now, our defense stops now,..

feel the chi and the universe bros,....

the negative waves just cause Butterflies to spontaneously combust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...