Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pure Speculation: Barkley to Bucs?


dldove77

Recommended Posts

Follow me here... everyone is talking about the top of the draft going QB-QB-QB, but if I’m a team that thinks they’re only one special player away from the next level - like ATL a few years back when they went up to get Julio - I’m not just going to sit there and let Cleveland get their QB at 1 and their RB at 4. 

Tampa fits that bill. They think they’re close. They’re desperate. They’re strong at a number of other positions on both sides of the ball. Just cut Doug Martin. Why not move up?

And dropping to 7 isn’t that severe a drop for the Giants if it means picking up some value in the second and third this year and next year. 

After the Jets surprised everyone by moving up before they even know who they’re going to get, this has a feeling of “the race is on” to get NY to trade that second pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know how anyone would think Tampa is close, their biggest issue is under center.  Jameis isn't the answer for them imo, he makes very bad decisions with the football and a RB would only help so much when Winston is airing out the ball to the other team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

10 minutes ago, Dunn said:

Don't know how anyone would think Tampa is close, their biggest issue is under center.  Jameis isn't the answer for them imo, he makes very bad decisions with the football and a RB would only help so much when Winston is airing out the ball to the other team. 

True.  but getting Barkley could also cut down the number of passes he throws in a game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Cdpg said:

And when they sell the farm for the number 2 pick, and the browns take Barkley at one who's the pick?

 

I think it depends on other trades if teams start to move up to grab  Qbs 1-4 and the Bucs get a chance to  trade up to 5 it may be worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Dunn said:

Don't know how anyone would think Tampa is close, their biggest issue is under center.  Jameis isn't the answer for them imo, he makes very bad decisions with the football and a RB would only help so much when Winston is airing out the ball to the other team. 

The coach and GM who are tied at the hip to Jameis and have given him a ton of weapons... those guys think they're close, and if they don't get to the next level soon, they're all out. But if they had major concerns about Winston, they wouldn't have invested in pass catchers - they would have invested in a new QB. 

And I don't think you're being fair by saying he's not the answer. His numbers aren't that bad. A good running back would really help him out. 

31 minutes ago, Cdpg said:

And when they sell the farm for the number 2 pick, and the browns take Barkley at one who's the pick?

 

Then you take the consensus best defensive player, Chubb. 

The Bucs lost six games by five points or less, plus another by six in overtime. If you have an all-world RB you have to like your chances to turn around those games. 

Of course, he could bust, but if you're staring down the barrel of another losing season and getting fired like Dirk and the GM are... he's probably worth the risk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...