If you want a good Gettleman laugh this morning

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

So you want to talk about G-man..ok..no they didn't fire him twice...

 Yea....I’m gonna take the advice given and drop you in the Sanjay category. Impossible to have a conversation with an IQ this low. Bye. 

[Mr. Scot]

3 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

I've been on point...your logical fallacy misses once again...

@Toomers

Case in point.

I'm not sure if he genuinely believes he's smarter than he really is or if he's just being a dumbass. Either way, it's kind of boring. 

He's never really had anything relevant to say. Pretty good number of folks just ignore him.

 

[heel31ok]

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 Fine. Then what did you mean about Gman when you said “again”. Did they fire him twice? Explain that?

  And what was i wrong about? The no back to back losing season? The 1’winning season in Hurneys last 7 years? Their actual records? That there accomplishments are not comparable. Please do tell. Because the only thing you’ve done is d CLE this away from sticking your foot in your mouth. Nothin disputing my facts besides some “feelings”. 

Comparing same time frames very similar and again G-man trending down... 

[heel31ok]

2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

He's an idiot. There's your explanation 

Lol...

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

Comparing same time frames very similar and again G-man trending down... 

What time frames? Who was this GM during this similar time frame you speak of?

[heel31ok]

50 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 Fine. Then what did you mean about Gman when you said “again”. Did they fire him twice? Explain that?

  And what was i wrong about? The no back to back losing season? The 1’winning season in Hurneys last 7 years? Their actual records? That there accomplishments are not comparable. Please do tell. Because the only thing you’ve done is d CLE this away from sticking your foot in your mouth. Nothin disputing my facts besides some “feelings”. 

No feelings at all ...record is public

[heel31ok]

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

What time frames? Who was this GM during this similar time frame you speak of?

Hurney...you knew that

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Hurney...you knew that

 How could I know when you have repeatedly denied from the moment I brought it up. So you did think it was a good idea to hire back the guy who, in your Words we “let go too far”, because the current one was “trending” that way. Something you just spent two pages denying you ever mentioned.

  Now do you see why people take you as seriously as a crackhead. You’re either highly ignorant or purposefully obtuse for attention. Get a damn life!

[heel31ok]

13 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 How could I know when you have repeatedly denied from the moment I brought it up. So you did think it was a good idea to hire back the guy who, in your Words we “let go too far”, because the current one was “trending” that way. Something you just spent two pages denying you ever mentioned.

  Now do you see why people take you as seriously as a crackhead. You’re either highly ignorant or purposefully obtuse for attention. Get a damn life!

I never denied it...and no I never thought it was a good idea to rehire Hurney...your recollection of the conversation is inaccurate...you tried to change the subject then got mad when I stayed on my point...I am always open to talking different issues...oh and its none of my concern how others take me...especially when they try to play games instead of sticking to the point...

[Toomers]

2 hours ago, heel31ok said:

I'm speaking of G-man...

 

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

The subject was G-man..

These are the first two denials. Want more. You’re just sad at this point. I’m back to leaning towards complete incompetence.

[heel31ok]

13 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 

These are the first two denials. Want more. You’re just sad at this point. I’m back to leaning towards complete incompetence.

Those are declarative statements...not denials...any other "proof"

[heel31ok]

14 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 

These are the first two denials. Want more. You’re just sad at this point. I’m back to leaning towards complete incompetence.

You do more than lean towards ignorance...you are in all out sprint towards it...

[Toomers]

17 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Those are declarative statements...not denials...any other "proof"

They are denials when they were answers to the question of who you were talking. Fuvking  idiot

[Toomers]

16 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

You do more than lean towards ignorance...you are in all out sprint towards it...

Find one person on here who believes any of your BS on this thread. Against undeniable facts....you’re a lying POS. And the proof is all over this thread. Ask anyone.