Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid Press Conference


Saca312

Recommended Posts

It sucks because when black people protest income inequality and police reform, it will actually benefit us all if their demands are met. But the Southern Strategy seems to make poor white people think that black folks are trying to steal from white people's plates to feed themselves when that isn't the case at all. 

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

that's why this whole "some racial demographics don't work as hard or don't stress education" trope is so offensive and harmful. It's actually divisive as fug and does way more to divide people than any police brutality protest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Also,  no one is arguing that inequality doesn't affect white people or anyone else. It affects black people worse bc of past and current systems of racism. Matthias has painstakingly tried to explain this. 

At this point i think you're being obtuse on purpose. 

Saying it affects black people worse is a generalization based on bias and vast observation of a much deeper narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

You haven't added poo to this thread besides your lived experiences, which i actually totally empathize with because income inequality is bullshit and college is fuging expensive and life really is hard for a lot of people. But you can't help but harbor animosity towards black people who have the audacity to speak up about racism. That says more about you than anything else. 

Listening to brainwashed idiots cry racism or systematic oppression for every facet of their life that went wrong falls on deaf ears

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Why is that?

Why do white high school dropouts make a higher income than black people with a two year degree?  It's all in the family.  Its more likely white high school drop outs have family that can hook them up with a decent job.  It doesn't matter whether we talk wealth or income, the reason why the numbers are so large have to do with history.  Again, black people gained their first sense of citizenship in the late 60s.  Any time we see something like this....
 

 

This literally happened.  Even when we gained citizenship in the late 60s, when we started running, we had to deal with ongoing road blocks as shown in this video.  Mass incarceration, redlining, so on and so forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ImaginaryKev said:

It sucks because when black people protest income inequality and police reform, it will actually benefit us all if their demands are met. But the Southern Strategy seems to make poor white people think that black folks are trying to steal from white people's plates to feed themselves when that isn't the case at all. 

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

that's why this whole "some racial demographics don't work as hard or don't stress education" trope is so offensive and harmful. It's actually divisive as fug and does way more to divide people than any police brutality protest. 

Your right If you think about it The super wealthy  (bank family wealthy) needs the poor of this country to fight it's useless wars for the Military industrial complex and they know a poor white would be  more "patriotic" to fight for them instead  of  marginalized minority so keep the poor divided even though  poor black people have more in common with poor whites but they need those majority  poor whites to who would more likely  enlist and fight these wars just to continue de-stabilize  "middle east"  I  mean look how  the veterans  that are bad off are treated where it counts...just my $0.02 

 

USA is really nothing more then a private military  contractor for the 1%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Matthias said:

It's hard for you to have this conversation.  How can you keep talking about a black man with money, which represents .00001% of his whole group, to a poor white man, who represents 4-5% of his group?  This conversation is about the group!!!!!  Take a look at this chart.....

5-95_0.png

You see that blue line?  That represents white Americans as a whole, and what I see is more than half of all white families have at least 100k in net worth.  Look at the green line.  That represents black people, and that line only begins to lift once you reach around the 60% mark.  Here's the same chart by the actual numbers.....


table_0.png

 

Look at that!  This basically says 65% of all black people (ALL) have the same amount of wealth as the bottom 30% of white America.  Yet you want to talk to me about poor white men, when almost all of black people are poor as dirt.  That's not going to fly with me.  I don't know what to tell you.

Not sure if you’re actually reading my posts or not but I’ll try to echo my thoughts one last time before bed as I’ve already wasted most of my evening.

 

I agree there is a racial income gap. What’re your thoughts on promoting change for this and how do you justify the change for one population versus the next if there are outliers from the norm in each population? How do we make things fair for everyone based on their familial background because we have also clearly determined that ones whiteness does not necessarily equal ones success either? It has been argued that the generation baton pass if you will is a sole determination of ones success so are we raising awareness for only one particular group of those less fortunate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

No, it's based on data. Which you summarily ignore for some reason. For real this time, take care. 

Ones suffering is a purely subjective thing so not sure how you quantify that. But alrighty then. Night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
    • a) That they made it a point in the room to point at the paper and say, "hope the camera got that" suggests we really did target the players we wanted and got them. While there is a ton of editing happening to cut out conversations not related to the players we picked, there didn't seem to be a lot of panic about who/what was going on b) Tepper appreciates the analytics. Now that he has a few years to see how the front office team works together to do the analysis, it still looks like he's hands-off (he's learned his lesson??). He seemed less vocal than in previous years' Blueprints (at least, in the edit).  I wouldn't expect Canales to be overly vocal in the draft room - he's likely already made his opinions known behind the scenes about certain players. Draft day is Morgan and Tilis and Eager's day. Loved seeing their interactions/conversations  c) that's all Eager. There's a great piece somewhere about the analytics engine he built floating around somewhere (maybe it was just after the draft?), and how he's constantly tweaking it with info about the players and input from the coaching staff.  That the post-draft press - for the most part - all seem to be overly positive about the draft actions we had compared to other teams makes it seem like we've gotten the ship moving in the right direction. Whether it translates to on-field results, well, that's a different topic for hundreds of other threads
×
×
  • Create New...