Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dudes and Dudettes


dcpanther89

Recommended Posts

Calmate your tetas we’re 3-2, second place in the NFCS, the season is far from over. We have new coordinators trying to put on their proverbial condoms in the dark to fun the rest of the league in the fanny. poo takes time guys! We have yet to thoroughly lose a game. Minus one or two first half mistakes we adjusted in the second half but for the most part it was too late. Both games consisted of the same first half issues, lack of a run game on offense and allowing the run to open up play action thus taking advantage of our Swiss cheese zone coverage. If these issues arise after week 12 I’d understand the complaints more but at this moment you want to have film to review to fix it sooner rather than later. Look at it like this we either finish the season and learn from our mistakes and hopefully triumph at the end or we rid ourselves of the dad from Berenstain Bears, an oafish dimwit but with good intentions. After losing the Super Bowl I’ve honestly been tired of Rivera’s and his blind loyalty to “his guys”. We have a new owner that’s hungry to win and I HIGHLY doubt he’s complacent enough to settle for less than a perennial Super Bowl contender. So I say sit back allow the season to play out and give it until the Sunday before black Monday to react. 

 

Commence the down pour of tears! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are quick to panic because every loss is monumental when the Saints are out there decimating teams that we are are just barely beating, or losing to week in and week out.  The Saints are going to eradicate us in the dome.  I'll go ahead and say right now it'll be worse than the Atlanta game two years ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

I think people are quick to panic because every loss is monumental when the Saints are out there decimating teams that we are are just barely beating, or losing to week in and week out.  The Saints are going to eradicate us in the dome.  I'll go ahead and say right now it'll be worse than the Atlanta game two years ago.  

I get your point, but the Saints barely squeaked by the Giants. Kamara broke off a big TD run with under 2 mins to seal it, iirc.

with that said, we are going to get absolutely throttled by them in the superdome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
    • The defense has pulled that feat off this season though.  Multiple times. offense has not had a single good first half all season.  Only and good opening scripted drive paired with disappointing play.  defense has been the actual unit you can measure real and consistent improvement IMO.  Still holes and flaws to it that aren’t going away until new bodies get here but they really are the story of the season IMO
    • One thing about RB's and LB's is they are going to get hurt. It's inevitable. Having a fresh Chuba is not a bad thing.  My only criticism of this entire situation is that I wish our staff would adjust personnel to matchup a little better. I think Chuba is a lot better than Rico against the stacked boxes we've seen the last two weeks. They are very different backs with very different strengths, and I love them both. Rico is so good at identifying the hole early, and hitting it full speed early. He's much better at breaking the big run. Chuba is a much more patient back, and finds 3 yards when there's nothing there better than Rico.  It's in no way a criticism of either, but I think Chuba would have had more success than Rico the way the Saints and Falcons attacked us from a Defensive standpoint.  When you put 9 in the box, often times there is no hole to attack. 
×
×
  • Create New...