Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do casual football fans blame Cam instead of Ron for this mess?


Recommended Posts

Just now, top dawg said:

Cute.

"Good" can easily turn into "great" with the proper personnel and staff. Some of the "great" ones were horrible when they first started, but all the great ones have been "good" at some point along the way. 

I don't know of many people that thought that Fox would ever be great. 

Well then, maybe Jeff Fisher deserved more opportunities. I mean if somebody gave him a few more years, perhaps he would have become great.

"Good" can turn into great. It can also turn into average or mediocre. And in the case of guys like I've mentioned above, it can forever remain at the level of "good, but not good enough".

Rivera has been in place for eight years. He is what he is. How many more years of Newton and Kuechly's playing prime are you willing to bet on the hope that Rivera suddenly becomes a championship level coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Mr. Scott I tend to agree with your view points most of the time and I agree with your views here as well. Where is the coaching that stands out from Ron. Where were the play calls that negated the pass rush? Putting Tolbert and Fozzy, Dickson who had sucked all yr in blocking was not an answer. If he watched any of our films he would have known that we were going to be in trouble. Especially Atl game. Nope the only thing he said We are going to do what we do..buying into the media that his way was unstoppable when on film it had already been revealed. Denver defense was much better than Atl . Just like he felled to watch the Steelers tape. It revealed the weakness of the team on both sides of the ball. What SB winning coach throws away film? That act right there tells it all not to mention giving days off when they played like they were already on vacation. Rivera and Shula felled the team as well as players execution. Tolbert should not even been on the team. His play had started declining previous yr film study would have told them this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then, maybe Jeff Fisher deserved more opportunities. I mean if somebody gave him a few more years, perhaps he would have become great.

"Good" can turn into great. It can also turn into average or mediocre. And in the case of guys like I've mentioned above, it can forever remain at the level of "good, but not good enough".

Rivera has been in place for eight years. He is what he is. How many more years of Newton and Kuechly's playing prime are you willing to bet on the hope that Rivera suddenly becomes a championship level coach?

And with your attitude, the team with all that Super Bowl hardware likely wouldn't have it.

And, for the record (again), if Tepper decides to fire Rivera, I'm all for it. But, if he decides to keep Rivera, I'm all for it as well. I can see the positives and negatives of either decision. Moreover, also for the record, I am not in favor of ditching Rivera because I don't think he can ever win a championship, I can see ditching him because sometimes a change and new blood is just warranted. The same can be said for a GM, or an aging QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Ron goes somewhere else and wins a SB I would be happy for him. The team that he has right now I believe he has done all he can do for them. The team itself was a SB team in 2015 but Ron' s and Shulas in ability to adjust cost the team severely. It is the reason why leads are never safe with the Panthers. Either Luke has to make an incredible play on defense or Cam on offense to save the day and that's  against any team we play (good or bad team). It' his style of play that handicaps this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Darvinsun said:

Well Mr. Scott I tend to agree with your view points most of the time and I agree with your views here as well. Where is the coaching that stands out from Ron. Where were the play calls that negated the pass rush? Putting Tolbert and Fozzy, Dickson who had sucked all yr in blocking was not an answer. If he watched any of our films he would have known that we were going to be in trouble. Especially Atl game. Nope the only thing he said We are going to do what we do..buying into the media that his way was unstoppable when on film it had already been revealed. Denver defense was much better than Atl . Just like he felled to watch the Steelers tape. It revealed the weakness of the team on both sides of the ball. What SB winning coach throws away film? That act right there tells it all not to mention giving days off when they played like they were already on vacation. Rivera and Shula felled the team as well as players execution. Tolbert should not even been on the team. His play had started declining previous yr film study would have told them this.

Player evaluation and game day coaching decisions / management are Rivera's biggest weaknesses.

I don't see him getting better at either of those things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Darvinsun said:

If Ron goes somewhere else and wins a SB I would be happy for him. The team that he has right now I believe he has done all he can do for them. The team itself was a SB team in 2015 but Ron' s and Shulas in ability to adjust cost the team severely. It is the reason why leads are never safe with the Panthers. Either Luke has to make an incredible play on defense or Cam on offense to save the day and that's  against any team we play (good or bad team). It' his style of play that handicaps this team.

The players not executing was why we lost the Super Bowl, that and the fact that perhaps we were simply outclassed by a superior football team.

As for Rivera, I think that what seems like his reluctance to step on the gas and someone's throat (thereby allowing other teams to hang around) is perhaps a valid one.This, along with his undying penchant for vets, regardless, along with the his undying loyalty to his underling protogès when things aren't going well is certainly a problem. I would still like to think that he can get over those weaknesses, but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

And with your attitude, the team with all that Super Bowl hardware likely wouldn't have it.

And, for the record (again), if Tepper decides to fire Rivera, I'm all for it. But, if he decides to keep Rivera, I'm all for it as well. I can see the positives and negatives of either decision. Moreover, also for the record, I am not in favor of ditching Rivera because I don't think he can ever win a championship, I can see ditching him because sometimes a change and new blood is just warranted. The same can be said for a GM, or an aging QB.

Yeah...That first statement doesn't really make any sense, but okay.

I'm not happy with keeping Rivera, but I can live with it if we get a new GM who 1) can help in some of the areas where Rivera is deficient, and 2) has authority to evaluate him and decide whether to keep him or not.

As mentioned elsewhere, if this happens it'll be the third time a GM has been fired while Rivera's been coaching here.  Some players are "coach killers". Rivera might just be a "GM killer".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...That first statement doesn't really make any sense, but okay.

I'm not happy with keeping Rivera, but I can live with it if we get a new GM who 1) can help in some of the areas where Rivera is deficient, and 2) has authority to evaluate him and decide whether to keep him or not.

As mentioned elsewhere, if this happens it'll be the third time a GM has been fired while Rivera's been coaching here.  Some players are "coach killers". Rivera might just be a "GM killer".

It makes plenty of sense. See Chuck Knoll, Bill Cowher, and, yes, Mike Tomlin. 

Tony Dungy was pretty damned good also. And, personally, I think that J.J. got rid of Tom Landry too soon, and there are others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

It makes plenty of sense. See Chuck Knoll, Bill Cowher, and, yes, Mike Tomlin. 

Tony Dungy was pretty damned good also. And, personally, I think that J.J. got rid of Tom Landry too soon, and there are others.

You're preaching the importance of patience using the example of a coach who won a Super Bowl in his second year? :thinking:

Cowher took 15 seasons to win a Super Bowl.  Are you willing to be that patient with Rivera?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're preaching the importance of patience using the example of a coach who won a Super Bowl in his second year? :thinking:

Cowher took 15 seasons to win a Super Bowl.  Are you willing to be that patient with Rivera?

I just want a Super Bowl before I die. If I'm alive and it takes seven more seasons, then I'd be happy as hell. 

Didn't take too long did it? But the actual point is that he won it, and the Steelers FO, true to its philosophy, still retains Tomlin, as it believes he will bring the organization more hardware. And who can argue with them based upon their history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I just want a Super Bowl before I die. If I'm alive and it takes seven more seasons, then I'd be happy as hell. 

Didn't take too long did it? But the actual point is that he won it, and the Steelers FO, true to its philosophy, still retains Tomlin, as it believes he will bring the organization more hardware. And who can argue with them based upon their history?

Apparently, David Tepper could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

If rumors are true. Doesn't mean he was right though. 

I would add that sometimes there is no right or wrong, just difference.

It's all judgment calls. Nobody knows the future.

My judgment: Rivera isn't good enough. The team's judgment May differ.

If it does I hope they're right and I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...