Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What team would we be like with a good QB..


Sword

Recommended Posts

QB is absolutely huge. The difference between having an elite one and a terrible one are tremendous.

Almost any team in this league could be good with an elite QB. I'd wager to say that a team that runs the ball very well and has a decent defense (if not above average) could be pretty dangerous with an elite QB. I think with a decent to good QB we'd have a shot at a wildcard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had a truly elite QB we'd be 6-0 right now, and with a good QB 5-1. It's really sad that Jake had to have a complete breakdown this year because if he played as well as he did last year during the regular season we would have had a chance at 4-2 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 4-2 maybe 5-1,could have beat the falcons, not sure about the eagles, of course we would have won today.

Eli has been picked twice already by the cards.

The thing with the Eagles game is we would not have turned the ball over as much. So really that could have been a win also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone seemed to miss the question. He wasn't asking what would our record be like. He asked what team would we resemble.

With an above average QB, we'd be the Vikings.

Lol, I'm glad you caught it..but at least it sparked conversation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...