Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We'd be a 15-1 - 13-3 team if we had a D coordinator who isn't a dumbass.


John Fox

Recommended Posts

Don't give me that Kemo wasn't there bullshit. Good defensive coordinators can adjust to injuries. Take a look at New England, shut down the Cards and their two pro bowl receivers receivers, and Tim Hightower. Look at Seattle, they suck ass, but pretty much everyone on that defense is injured. They held the Jets to 3 points.

The problem to this team is obvious, it's THE TURD.

Is there really any doubt turd is the worst defensive coach in the league? Send his ass to the CFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why don't you fire him coach?

What, has he got pictures of you in assless chaps with a goat or something?

I'm pretty sure thats Hurney's job boy. We've got to stick through the season, firing a coordinator in December is just bad.

But, mark my words, the turd will get flushed this off season,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm, did you just use Seattle as an example? They have only won 3 games all season and been completely blown out several times. That game for them was the exception to the season. You also can't really use New England as an example either at is clearly the scheme designed by Bellicheck who is responsible for their success year after year.

Whilst good Co-ords can adapt to injuries, not many can adjust to losing your two starting DTs. Look what happened to the Vikes after losing Pat. Pretty similar situation to ours but we lost Lewis in the game as well.

Whilst everyone wants to have a defensive genuis generating defenses like the Steelers or Ravens where they can take the ball away every play the co-ords resonsible for those schemes are few and far between, most of which will get head coaching jobs and thus we would need to get rid of Fox to get one of them. So getting someone brilliant is really quite rare. Oh and using your incredible logic, what the hell happened to the Steelers D? Over 30 points? They must be a terrible D.

Some people really need to grow up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't give me that Kemo wasn't there bullsh*t. Good defensive coordinators can adjust to injuries. Take a look at New England, shut down the Cards and their two pro bowl receivers receivers, and Tim Hightower. Look at Seattle, they suck ass, but pretty much everyone on that defense is injured. They held the Jets to 3 points.

The problem to this team is obvious, it's THE TURD.

Is there really any doubt turd is the worst defensive coach in the league? Send his ass to the CFL.

Actually, all teams suffer from injuries. For example with Robbins, Burress and Jacobs out, the Giants lost two of three. When two of those guys come back, then they win. Thats the way things go. Adjustments for one injury are possible, but when you lose two or three at a critical position as we have, that you get situations like last night. And we were not playing the Cards. We were playing the defending superbowl champs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that. We put our foot up their ass the first half. Just seemed like our boys stayed in the locker room the whole 2nd.

That's our team philosophy though. We play to protect a lead, thus why Smith vanished off the radar and we pretty much only ran the second half, regardless of how many they were stacking the box with. We basically come out of halftime in situations like that saying "just hold on! Only 30 minutes to go!" We play to hold on, not to put the game away.

I think the Giants, by being more confident in all facets of their Offense, are the better team.

Just opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...