Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I repeat, Deangelo Williams Isn't The Answer


Cyclonus

Recommended Posts

Deangelo Williams isn't the answer. DeShaun Foster is the starter for a reason. He is obviously the better RB in practice. If Deangelo is on the bench it's because he can't get it done in the NFL and Fox knows it.

Remember that debate? Now replace Denagelo's name with Matt Moore and Fosters name with Delhomme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand your point, I do not believe that this is quite the same situation.

I am not going to all out disagree, but I think you should reexamine your viewpoint.

edit: Let me just add though that I am leaning more and more towards wanting to see what Moore can do as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember when king taharqua insisted that deangelo william's 5+ypc in 2007 was just because deshaun foster was softening up the defense for him?

lol

Yep, which is why I always ignore his posts because even my grandmother knows more about football than he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deangelo Williams isn't the answer. DeShaun Foster is the starter for a reason. He is obviously the better RB in practice. If Deangelo is on the bench it's because he can't get it done in the NFL and Fox knows it.

Remember that debate? Now replace Denagelo's name with Matt Moore and Fosters name with Delhomme.

since this thread's reasoning has already been ripped to part, i figured i'd go ahead and pile on top too!

williams then, had massive potential which warranted him a first round selection. moore has a very small fraction of the potential williams had. that's not to say he couldn't become the next brady if given the chance and though very likely he wouldn't be the next brady, he could be a very big improvement on delhomme. but we will never know if he isn't given the chance and since its obvious our playoff chances are over, there's no reason not to give him the chance this season to see what he has. if nothing else, it would prove that he's also worthless like jake and we can get rid of the both of them by next season. otherwise, he's still on the squad next season and if we find out then he's worthless, we possibly lose another season due to horrible QB play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...