Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortgage licensing...


dimbee

Recommended Posts

Is a serious pain in the ass! I'm taking the National licensing test this week, and taking the tests for the 15 states I'll be licensed in over the coming 2 months... holy sheez, the disparity from one state to another as far as their testing goes is ridiculous!

Granted, it's great that there will be an inordinately greater amount of regulation in the industry, come 2010, which is a good thing for all- no more absolute horseshit "Good Faith Estimates" that lure a borrower into doing a loan only to get screwed at closing, but still it's hard to sell loans when I'm doing 40 hours of continued education for each state I'm getting licensed!

It's going to be a couple of bare bones months until year-end... thankfully, November and December typically are. Just going to be tight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy CRAP! Day 1 is done, and let me tell you, there is going to be a serious thinning of the herd come Jan. 1, 2010. Without going into details, let me tell y'all that Mortgage Broker shops will soon be a thing of the past- they're done. Won't be able to make a living, which is sad for those who are in that role currently, but they simply won't be able to compete after the new year when a borrower looks at their numbers compared to a bank's numbers (closing costs and fees). I'm just doing the Federal (US gov't) licensing right now, and it's fuggen ridiculous. The company I work for has 2 offices- 1 here, and 1 in Irvine, CA. The folks in Irvine took their tests last week- 60% failed the test. It is arduous and more than ridiculous. I am telling you all right now- mortgage brokers are a thing of the past come 2010. That's not necessarily a good or bad thing, because there are plenty of shops who do business the right way. However, the real premise of how they make money on selling a loan is DONE. The new Federal licensing regulations are so in-depth and comprehensive, it's mind boggling. There are 6 different versions of the test, with very different wording for the questions asked. Also, the questions asked have very little to do with the actual sale of the loan. When I'm selling a loan, RESPA, ECOA, TILA, HMDA, etc. have absolutely nothing to do with getting a borrower to commit. No longer. I'm beyond being apprehensive and now am to the point of scared about how I am going to do my job. This has absolutely nothing to do with me not adhering to those Federal standards, whatsoever, let me be clear. I, thankfully, work for a company that has completely removed any potential to be unscrupulous, for which I am most thankful because I sleep soundly every night. Regardless, the Federal regulations that will take effect Jan. 1, 2010 (of which my company is already adhering to- to my knowledge the only major lender doing so), is going to take refinancing a mortgage from a 15-21 day process to a 45-60 day process.

My initial feeling is that this will not be good. Not necessarily so much to me, but more so to the borrower. When you drag the process out that long, the change in interest rates can be minimal, but more often they are quite dramatic. 45 days later, an interest rate's pricing can swing dramatically.

I am NOT a fan of this.

I am having to go through this enormous amount of "education" for which I feel the borrower is going to be the one that loses. I can sell a good loan all day long, but when an interest rate can and does change as much it as does and will in the amount of time the Fed's are going to require 01/2010, it makes me apprehensive of being in this industry. That is a scary thought.

fug me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good luck.

I'm sure it is as boring as the seminar on liens that I took a while back. God how boring of a job could i have?! When i was a little girl i wanted to be a dancer why didn't i go that route?! no money but hella more fun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Education is done and I've fought a headache the last 2 nights. I feel like a sponge that's absorbed as much as it can and all of the extra liquid/education is just making more liquid/education drip out the other side. Studying this weekend, testing Tuesday AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...