Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Current View of our Roster Update- I added my roster projection on Page 7 with FA and some Draft Picks.


Matt62881

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Matt62881 said:

Fuller had a down year I Kansas city, he might play a one year prove it deal, out of the guys I mentioned the only ones that will cost are Bradberry and Tre. The rest of them can go if they want too much, Tre was a fine FS and Bradberry while not top 5 should squeak in the top 10 and be paid as such. You cant replace Luke but shaq did manage 109 stops beside Luke's 144, not bad. Shaq I'm guessing will get more like 140 this year being the features MLB. He shouldn't see as many olineman in his face either with proper DT play. Haynes and Miller will be rotational, let's say we dont keep Irvin, for passing downs. Burns and Addison would be our primary ends but yes we could use someone else here, wouldn't mind bringing west back cheap for running downs. There are other things to be ironed out but this roster would be a start. Oh and I forgot Obada on the edge.

  So now what’s the plan if you’re letting go of Addison, McCoy, Irvin, who’s replacing them. 
 

And how many tackles Shaq had/has is of little concern. Where he’s making them is. And are you getting rid of Addison or not? It’s probably 10M/ year to sign him. Or are we letting everyone but a JB and Tre go? All these decisions would have to be made? And you’re creating a new hole with every move now. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

And you still dont address the oline.  The Achilles heel of this team.  And man, I am not sure what team you are watching but we absolutely need help at wr. 

Even in your best case scenario draft and FA we are still paper thin and weak on defense. 

Like brizz just said, we need to burn this puppy down and start anew.  And that doesnt include cam.  Sorry, it just doesnt.

If we are burning it down then I agree about Cam but to say our wrs suck? Did you watch DJ Moore, hes easily our best wr since SS89 and Curtis is fine as our #2. If you had read my initial post I adressed Center with our 2nd pick and a guard can be found later or Dayley can play LG. Offense isnt the concern imo, its defense, namely the D-Line, wich is why I'm applying so much to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

  So now what’s the plan if you’re letting go of Addison, McCoy, Irvin, who’s replacing them. 
 

And how many tackles Shaq had/has is of little concern. Where he’s making them is. And are you getting rid of Addison or not? It’s probably 10M/ year to sign him. Or are we letting everyone but a JB and Tre go? All these decisions would have to be made? And you’re creating a new hole with every move now. 
 

And he still hasnt address the oline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  So now what’s the plan if you’re letting go of Addison, McCoy, Irvin, who’s replacing them. 
 

And how many tackles Shaq had/has is of little concern. Where he’s making them is. And are you getting rid of Addison or not? It’s probably 10M/ year to sign him. Or are we letting everyone but a JB and Tre go? All these decisions would have to be made? And you’re creating a new hole with every move now. 
 

I would think the market for Addison would be less then that but I could be wrong, he would be a must sign. McCoy is only a sign if he comes cheap enough, as I believe we need to double dip DT. Ideally D. Brown and Leki if he makes it to the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt62881 said:

If we are burning it down then I agree about Cam but to say our wrs suck? Did you watch DJ Moore, hes easily our best wr since SS89 and Curtis is fine as our #2. If you had read my initial post I adressed Center with our 2nd pick and a guard can be found later or Dayley can play LG. Offense isnt the concern imo, its defense, namely the D-Line, wich is why I'm applying so much to it.

I never said the wr suck.  We need more depth.  Samuels is okay.  nothing special.  So now we are relying on a 2nd rd rookie center to step in and be the navigator?  You keep saying so and so can be found later.  No dude thats how we been rolling for years and it hasnt worked.  We have no idea if daley (a 6th rd pick) will work at guard but we sure as hell know he doesnt work at LT. 

 

Offense isnt the concern?  Sweet Jesus man.  I think I am tapping out of this with you because its clear we are not watching the same team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matt62881 said:

I would think the market for Addison would be less then that but I could be wrong, he would be a must sign. McCoy is only a sign if he comes cheap enough, as I believe we need to double dip DT. Ideally D. Brown and Leki if he makes it to the 3rd.

So far you have 2 dlinemen and 1 center in the draft for the first 3 rounds and we still dont have a LT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt62881 said:

You didn't read I just did above, center in the second, a 1 year deal to a vet like jason Peter's , move dayley to guard or draft one late.

How is a one year deal going to work dude?  How does that fit teppers plan of long term stability?  you are clearly not seeing the big picture here.  Clearly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I never said the wr suck.  We need more depth.  Samuels is okay.  nothing special.  So now we are relying on a 2nd rd rookie center to step in and be the navigator?  You keep saying so and so can be found later.  No dude thats how we been rolling for years and it hasnt worked.  We have no idea if daley (a 6th rd pick) will work at guard but we sure as hell know he doesnt work at LT. 

 

Offense isnt the concern?  Sweet Jesus man.  I think I am tapping out of this with you because its clear we are not watching the same team. 

Dude our depth at wr is fine, not even near the top of our concerns, the oline is the only issue and qb if Kyle Allen is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How is a one year deal going to work dude?  How does that fit teppers plan of long term stability?  you are clearly not seeing the big picture here.  Clearly

It works as a stop gap until either Little improves or we draft another LT. You want to just call little a bust and throw in the towel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How is a one year deal going to work dude?  How does that fit teppers plan of long term stability?  you are clearly not seeing the big picture here.  Clearly

You seem to be one of those guys that thinks all pros should be at every position, it doesnt work that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matt62881 said:

It works as a stop gap until either Little improves or we draft another LT. You want to just call little a bust and throw in the towel?

He is not a starter right now.  Man again you are missing the picture here.  Tepper doesnt want this stop gap crap.  He wants a system.  This isnt a system you are describing, its throwing poo against the wall and praying.  Why would Rhule want to work like that?  It makes no sense.

 

And you are operating under the cloudy premise that Cam comes back 100% healthy and is still the runner and threat he was 3(?) years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matt62881 said:

You seem to be one of those guys that thinks all pros should be at every position, it doesnt work that way.

All pros no.  Serviceable Left tackles that dont get our qb killed yes.  None of which are on the roster.  Please dont try and kid yourself and make an argument for little or Daley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the ‘issue’ here is that we had two guys that clashed for several reasons. In some ways they were different, but in other ways they had a lot in common, and sadly they couldn’t see the forest for the trees. Sometimes when you have two people like that together they are either going to love or hate each other, and if it’s the latter, you need someone to mediate and hope the two individuals are capable of putting their differences aside for the common good. In this instance, they couldn’t find a way to move forwards together because I don’t think either guy wanted to play second fiddle to the other. This video basically said neither guy had the tools to bridge that gap and mend that fence, and perhaps also were unwilling to give an inch at that stage in their lives and careers. So a divorce, while unfortunate, was always likely. Do we win the Super Bowl with Smitty and Cam? Well, it’s one of life’s big what ifs for us Panthers fans.
    • Dude, I think I might be having Jarvy withdrawals... I ripped the sleeves off of all of my t-shirts in my sleep last night. Every bite of my Alpha-Bita cereal spelled Seth, this morning. And, I took 7 naps before lunch. I'm losing it guys! Jarvy's Jaunty Band of Jaggoffs are getting more play than he is... smh Team Canada doesn't treasure Jarvis the way he deserves. He should take his band down to Liechtenstein, get a bag of passports, and start his own Olympic team! The raw animal magnetism of Jarvilicious will bring in a handful of NHLers on its own. And, since the IOC believes in collective punishment, he could have his pick of the rookies. Then, just fill out the rest of the roster with the maple blooded great white northerners who couldn't make the top squad. Can't trust this assembled awesomery to just any old Liechtensteinien with a clipboard and a whistle. Gotta bring in a legend worthy of this gold medal gambit. A hockey HOFer with the balls to buck the system and the aura to match our maverick. Huere geil, Vaduz!!! 2030 Gold Medal guaranteed!
    • Tennessee isn't trading a QB on a 2nd round contract that has starting experience.  That's bad business.
×
×
  • Create New...