Does this team have less talented players than the 2010 team?

[kungfoodude]

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I dont necessarily think they have less talent, it just not developed yet. 

It's true that part of this comparison will be best done in hindsight. If some of our current roster develops into the next wave of stars for the team, this "least talented roster ever" debate won't age well. 

Admittedly, it's really hard to see many guys that are capable of being future "core" players. I would assume you would include all the rookies(just because we don't know enough about them yet), DJ Moore, Weatherly, Robby Anderson, Rasul Douglas, Moton, and Okung. Really, beyond that it is hard to see much else that would even be considered as players capable of making a step up in their career. The roster is pretty heavy on temporary transitional players, at the moment.