Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte real estate market


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Also not sold today.  Attorney said the county is backed up.  Buyers are begging to move in.  I said no.

Yeah, you should say no. Are you in charlotte?  I got poo to do Thursday at the house so hopefully things go smoothly for me

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Yeah, you should say no. Are you in charlotte?  I got poo to do Thursday at the house so hopefully things go smoothly for me

Yea, Charlotte.  Now I got an email from buyers agent saying that money was sent by loan company to attorneys today but attorney told me they got money the money on Friday and there is a line at deeds office.  Some funky poo going on.

Did I say that buyer, lawyer and buyers agent are all Indian and know each other?

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Yea, Charlotte.  Now I got an email from buyers agent saying that money was sent by loan company to attorneys today but attorney told me they got money the money on Friday and there is a line at deeds office.  Some funky poo going on.

Did I say that buyer, lawyer and buyers agent are all Indian and know each other?

What does their ethnicity have to do with anything? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

Yea, Charlotte.  Now I got an email from buyers agent saying that money was sent by loan company to attorneys today but attorney told me they got money the money on Friday and there is a line at deeds office.  Some funky poo going on.

Did I say that buyer, lawyer and buyers agent are all Indian and know each other?

No money, no move in. It'd be a question for an attorney, but if you let them move in you might be facing having to legally evict them if this falls through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No money, no move in. It'd be a question for an attorney, but if you let them move in you might be facing having to legally evict them if this falls through.

I finally got paid...  So they wanted to move in today and I said no money no moving in.  Apparently attorney just got money today in escrow account... have no clue why they told me they got money on Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, toldozer said:

ripped carpet today. Hardwood in hallway, master and secondary bedroom. Subfloor in the 3rd bedroom upstairs  😕 anyone know a Hardwood flooring guy? 12x13 room

I hired Viking Hardwood Floors for my previous house but I changed the whole 2nd floor from carpet to hardwood. 

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...