Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: A.Rodgers wants out of Green Bay


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
37 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Who are the "insiders" you are referencing?

Go back and look at your own posts in some of the prior threads dude.

You posted a couple of times in the thread about Albert Breer's mock draft.

You're talking nonsense, dude.

Since you "know football" answer this -- when it came time for the Panthers to pick in your opinion who should they have chosen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You're talking nonsense, dude.

Since you "know football" answer this -- when it came time for the Panthers to pick in your opinion who should they have chosen?

So now your response to being wrong about something is to act like you don't remember saying it? Hilarious 😆

As to the Panthers pick, I'm fine with it. They got a good player at a need position, so it's cool.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

So now your response to being wrong about something is to act like you don't remember saying it? Hilarious 😆

As to the Panthers pick, I'm fine with it. They got a good player at a need position, so it's cool.

What did I supposedly say?  You said the mysterious/anonymous "insiders" said Tepper said he wanted Fields and now you're saying I said that too?  You have an incredible imagination pal...

I didn't ask if you were "fine with it"...

...I asked who YOU, as a self proclaimed "football expert", thought the Panthers should choose...

...do tell ol' soothsayer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

What did I supposedly say?  You said the mysterious/anonymous "insiders" said Tepper said he wanted Fields and now you're saying I said that too?  You have an incredible imagination pal...

I didn't ask if you were "fine with it"...

...I asked who YOU, as a self proclaimed "football expert", thought the Panthers should choose...

...do tell ol' soothsayer....

I already did 😃

And seriously dude, give it up. Nothing you say is going to happen ever happens. Going back to when you said we'd keep Marty Hurney, you're up to something like a dozen wrong prognostications in a row, not one of them even close to correct.

It's time to get out of the prediction business 😆

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I already did 😃

And seriously dude, give it up. Nothing you say is going to happen ever happens. Going back to when you said we'd keep Marty Hurney, you're up to something like a dozen wrong prognostications in a row, not one of them even close to correct.

It's time to get out of the prediction business 😆

More unsubstantiated nonsense from the ultimate keyboard warrior. 

Again, as the self-professed "football expert" you are, who was your top-pick for the Panthers in this draft?

Wasn't it Justin Fields?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

More unsubstantiated nonsense from the ultimate keyboard warrior. 

Again, as the self-professed "football expert" you are, who was your top-pick for the Panthers in this draft?

Wasn't it Justin Fields?

Wow 😆

You participated in a 30 page thread where people were arguing that the Panthers would take Fields because Albert Breer and Peter King (among others) were mocking him to the Panthers based on the rationale that Tepper wanted him. I was one of the people arguing against that being the right way to go.

One fun thing: You got schooled in that same thread over your prediction that Teddy Bridgewater wouldn't be traded and wouldn't take a pay cut.

I'm guessing you "don't remember" that either, but the fun thing is it's still on the board where everybody can see it 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wow 😆

You participated in a 30 page thread where people were arguing that the Panthers would take Fields because Albert Breer and Peter King (among others) were mocking him to the Panthers based on the rationale that Tepper wanted him. I was one of the people arguing against that being the right way to go.

One fun thing: You got schooled in that same thread over your prediction that Teddy Bridgewater wouldn't be traded and wouldn't take a pay cut.

I'm guessing you "don't remember" that either, but the fun thing is it's still on the board where everybody can see it 😆

More falsehoods and unsubstantiated nonsense from the ultimate keyboard warrior!

Again, as the self-professed "football expert" you are, who was your top-pick in real-time for the Panthers in this draft when it was their turn to pick?

If it wasn't Justin Fields who was it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

More falsehoods and unsubstantiated nonsense from the ultimate keyboard warrior!

Again, as the self-professed "football expert" you are, who was your top-pick in real-time for the Panthers in this draft when it was their turn to pick?

If it wasn't Justin Fields who was it?

 

I'm pretty sure several people on here can easily answer that question. I'm surprised you can't 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
16 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Again, as the self-professed "football expert" you are, who was your top-pick in real-time for the Panthers in this draft when it was their turn to pick?

If it wasn't Justin Fields who was it?

 

I'm pretty sure several people on here can easily answer that question. I'm surprised you can't

Why are you afraid to answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Why are you afraid to answer?

Wrong perception, dude.

Think of it as being taught how to fish

As usual the ultimate keyboard warrior refuses to ever get on the record...LOL.

Have you ever stopped to consider how much time you've spent saying nothing on this site over the last 12.5 years? 

It really is mindblowing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

As usual the ultimate keyboard warrior refuses to ever get on the record...LOL.

Have you ever stopped to consider how much time you've spent saying nothing on this site over the last 12.5 years? 

It really is mindblowing...

Nah 😁

Have you ever thought about how much time you spend on here trying to talk to me (usually about just one thing) when there are loads of other people and topics on here?

Perhaps you should.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

As usual the ultimate keyboard warrior refuses to ever get on the record...LOL.

Have you ever stopped to consider how much time you've spent saying nothing on this site over the last 12.5 years? 

It really is mindblowing...

Nah 😁

 

If 8hrs is considered the average work-day you're right at 6yrs of time logged (1,579 8hr work days).  That in itself is pretty astounding but the fact that you've spent the entire time only cutting & pasting really is the icing on the cake!

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...