Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral is here because of Ben McAdoo

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, CRA said:

Sam Darnold can be a bad at his job.  He can ALSO be used as a scapegoat at the same time.  Which he was and is. It's the whole two things can be true or apply concept. 

Sam Darnold was a problem here.  He wasn't the reason THE reason the offense sucked.   So the other reasons have to get their fair share of the attention because they are in reality are bigger factors.

When a Rhule defender brings up and gets hyper focused on Sam Darnold, they are generally using him as a tool to deflect away from the major factor (and bigger one) that Matt Rhule was in regards to what our pathetic offense. 

and the other problems are still here.  They deserve the focus.  Not Darnold. 

Again.....your entire rationale about Brady could be applied towards Sam Darnold.  Except not only do you not trip over yourself to rush in and defend Darnold anytime a criticism is levied towards him as you do for Brady, but you actively participate in the trashing of Darnold.  Possibly more than anyone else.  Are you or are you not deflecting blame from Rhule every single time you trash Darnold? I think Darnold deserves a ton of blame for our offense so don't misconstrue this as me defending Darnold, I'm instead trying to understand your argument.  You're saying one thing but your pattern of behavior prove the complete opposite.

I'm simply asking you what's the difference between the treatment of Brady vs. the treatment of Darnold...which you conveniently ignored entirely, just to continue to grandstand about how badly Joe Brady is wronged.  You didn't mention Darnold once in your entire response to me asking you how you draw a distinction between Darnold/Brady scapegoating.  Oh actually I know the difference between the two: the amount of Joe Brady criticism is about 0.000000001% of the amount of Darnold criticism.  Seriously, how often is Brady even mentioned on these boards?  Once every 2 months?  Why overblow this so badly?

There....since you're clearly having a tough time answering my question, I went through your own post and switched out "Joe Brady" for "Sam Darnold".  Does your post still hold true or not?  If so, why do you spend 75% of your posts on here trashing Darnold when he is only a small part of the problem and does not deserve the focus (your words)? If not, can you explain the difference?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Again.....your entire rationale about Brady could be applied towards Sam Darnold.  Except not only do you not trip over yourself to rush in and defend Darnold anytime a criticism is levied towards him as you do for Brady, but you actively participate in the trashing of Darnold.  Possibly more than anyone else.  Are you or are you not deflecting blame from Rhule every single time you trash Darnold? I think Darnold deserves a ton of blame for our offense so don't misconstrue this as me defending Darnold, I'm instead trying to understand your argument.  You're saying one thing but your pattern of behavior prove the complete opposite.

I'm simply asking you what's the difference between the treatment of Brady vs. the treatment of Darnold...which you conveniently ignored entirely, just to continue to grandstand about how badly Joe Brady is wronged.  You didn't mention Darnold once in your entire response to me asking you how you draw a distinction between Darnold/Brady scapegoating.  Oh actually I know the difference between the two: the amount of Joe Brady criticism is about 0.000000001% of the amount of Darnold criticism.  Seriously, how often is Brady even mentioned on these boards?  Once every 2 months?  Why overblow this so badly?

There....since you're clearly having a tough time answering my question, I went through your own post and switched out "Joe Brady" for "Sam Darnold".  Does your post still hold true or not?  If so, why do you spend 75% of your posts on here trashing Darnold when he is only a small part of the problem and does not deserve the focus (your words)? If not, can you explain the difference?

Apply it to Sam Darnold.   Sam Darnold isn’t the biggest issue. 

Biggest issue is a HC that traded away our draft capital for the worst starting QB in the NFL.  

Matt Rhule and Sam Darnold are still here.  Joe Brady isn’t.   So yeah, Joe Brady doesn’t get the same smoke.   The people here do.  Who also happened to be more impactful as to why we sucked on O.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Paa Langfart
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By Paa Langfart · Posted

      With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Swaggasaurus
      Jeremy Fowler: Panthers draft day intel

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...