Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who still supports this dumbass of a QB?...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

You still supported Fox in my other thread, so who looks silly now?

Where did I said I supported Fox right now? Maybe you took my comments out of content or didn't read it right. Nowhere did I said I want him back, since I clearly think we need a new coach. You're the one who look silly with making up lies about me, whiner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are fuged Qbs in are division

Drew Brees -Top 3 QB

Matt Ryan - Top 10 QB

Josh Freeman - reminds me of a younger taller version of Donovan Mcnabb

Jake Delhomme -32st worst starting QB(god i miss jamrcus russell he made jake look like a star)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did I said I supported Fox right now? Maybe you took my comments out of content or didn't read it right. Nowhere did I said I want him back, since I clearly think we need a new coach. You're the one who look silly with making up lies about me, whiner.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/25342-2002-john-fox-article-from-gameday-mag-3.html

Agreeing that Fox doesn't win because of talent and that the players don't appear unmotivated by him.

Then went on with you're denial of Jake's performance of last year. So 5 INTs in the Bucs games, a 57.1 cmp % and 1 INT in the Bears game, and the coaches calling more runs after Jakes INT in the Broncos game does not equal to bad games against Jake?

So keep lieing just to save face, it's not going to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only other thread I started was about Fox. This is about Jake. I rarely start threads. Get your facts straight. You have nothing to contribute to this thread, so why post? You still supported Fox in my other thread, so who looks silly now?

This thread has nothing to contribute to this forum. So why post it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only other thread I started was about Fox. This is about Jake. I rarely start threads. Get your facts straight. You have nothing to contribute to this thread, so why post? You still supported Fox in my other thread, so who looks silly now?
i think the complaint was that there are 5000 threads about jake sucking. this was just another one in the mosh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another day, another thread started by people who just whine & whine. We seen this kind of thread the last few weeks & we heard you clearly. No need to keep making this over & over, crybaby. And you sure love to call out anyone, when that is silly.

What precisely do you think you're doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/25342-2002-john-fox-article-from-gameday-mag-3.html

Agreeing that Fox doesn't win because of talent and that the players don't appear unmotivated by him.

Then went on with you're denial of Jake's performance of last year. So 5 INTs in the Bucs games, a 57.1 cmp % and 1 INT in the Bears game, and the coaches calling more runs after Jakes INT in the Broncos game does not equal to bad games against Jake?

So keep lieing just to save face, it's not going to work.

And nowhere on my last post right there did it show that I supported Fox 100% lately. None. I may have mention Jake there, but I was talking about Jake in the past where he was better than this year & how you refuse to give him credit at all, even the Superbowl season. Nice to put words in my mouth, liar. :toetap05:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And nowhere on my last post right there did it show that I supported Fox 100% lately. None. I may have mention Jake there, but I was talking about Jake in the past where he was better than this year & how you refuse to give him credit at all, even the Superbowl season. Nice to put words in my mouth, liar. :toetap05:

Hey, when you agree to a what a poster has said it's assumed you have the same views as that poster. Sorry for using common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, when you agree to a what a poster has said it's assumed you have the same views as that poster. Sorry for using common sense.

That right: it what you assume, not actual fact like you're accusing me of. Nice try with the finger pointing & weak accustation against me. I have made it clearly I don't want Fox here anymore, so don't try to accuse me of lying when that what you're doing with the finger pointing & such. So much for your common sense with putting words in my mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he WS so easy to suss out. They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
    • Sounds like a tad bit of what Josh Allen had. He would make throws that made zero sense die to his desire to make a make. Bryce also turns the ball over believing their is an unlimited shot clock in those moments. Sometimes the best play is to reset for the next one. 
    • See, I think one of his biggest issues is he bails too early.  His instinct has been to bail as soon as defenders get behind him and the pocket starts to close in. Taller QBs hang in there for that extra second or two and throw over guys as the pocket collapses in the QBs lap.  BY runs as soon as this starts to happen, which means routes don’t have time to develop and the field gets cut in half as soon as he runs. This last game I saw some signs of him being willing to hang in the pocket when the defense gets behind him, but that has been rare.  
×
×
  • Create New...