Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Well Will Matt Moore Play?


vapanthersfan

Recommended Posts

Homer in me says 18/22 for 200+yds and a td

Realist in me says 12/22 110 yds and 2+ picks.

I hope the realist is really just a pessimist and that I am wrong.

that is what the realist says? Moore has started games before.....yet you are predicting a 09 Jake Delhomme performance? against Tampa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is gonna make mistakes. What I want to see is Poise and the ability to get the ball deep. Seems 1/2 of Jake's INT's were underthrown balls.

I don't see him losing games for us. We do have a 3 game history with him and he didn't sux then, I don't see why some think he will now. Maybe it is those that are tunnelvision about drafting a QB and want him to fail.

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering that D-Will is out, I think that Stewart is going to have a MONSTER game today, and take a lot of the pressure off of Matt. If JStew can get it going early, I think that Matt could have a pretty easy game. Although that should have been the blueprint for Jake this year too.

Why is it that poo is so obvious to us, but Fox/Davidson just dont get it?

Hurrrrrrr Durrrrrrrr, we have the best rushing game in the league, lets let Jake throw the ball 45 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...