Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't get overly excited... it was the 1-10 Bucs


PuntJake

Recommended Posts

look at the stats. we pretty much got outplayed the entire game except for key int's in the red zone. if we pull that crap in the remaining schedule, we're going to lose out the rest of the season.

they more than doubled our passing yards and put up 315 against us. only had 3 yards less rushing but averaged over a yard more per carry!

they had 22 first downs to our 15.

if we play this poor next week against the pats in new england.......

we won why? great defensive plays at key moments plus winning the turnover battle.

but again..... this was against the worst team in the league.

but i am sure there will be those of us to declare moore the savior and boast that we're on our way to a superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore played the way a Carolina QB in a Fox offense needs to.....doesn't matter if it was Tampa. Moore is a better option than Jake...that is all that matters.

but just like Godfrey starting again....none of that matters to Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't say, "Without the redzone INTs we lose." We don't know what happens if the Bucs convert some of those redzone possessions into points. We may get blown out, or we may get a win. Fox calls plays based on the score. Yes, he loves to run draws on 3rd down, but we're trailing we'd be likely to see more throws.

Moore played well enough to win. He'll have to play better in subsequent games, but this was a good way to get him warmed up. He throws to multiple targets, made some nice passes, got the ball to a couple players deep. He made decent reads, and only had a couple bad throws. Yeah, it is just the Bucks, but how can you say he's not an upgrade over Jake? Look at Jake's game against TB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...