Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moore IS a better option than Jake.


PuntJake

Recommended Posts

Ive actually met Rodney before. Very cool fellow indeed. Tell Rodney for me to tell the Panthers they need to start drafting & giving young black QBs a chance like they gave him one. Im sure he would be all for it.

Well now you've got me all confused. In your signature, you claim the Panthers are "proudly saying no to black QBs since 1995" which comes off as really goddamn racist. And now you're talking about needing to give young black QBs a chance.

Hell, maybe I just need to leave work and go home to sleep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signature makes no sense - Pete played well after 1995 :P

RE: this topic, Jake was the first person to go to Moore's side and congratulate him after the first drive, and he was supposedly very supportive during the game. Jake WANTS Moore to succeed. Jake wants this team to win. Yes, he was upset on the sidelines at times - but not at Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's give Moore another game before passing judgement on his abilities. He got a boring win against a 1-10 team.

Next week will be a better test. If he can make it interesting at least, I'll be happy. If not, he may show that the problem doesn't start at the QB position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that if he STARTS next week against NE in Foxboro, it'll tell us alot more about #3 then we saw today.

IMO, having a bad game in a hostile cold enviroment will not tell us anymore than the game today did. Have to judge a Quarterback on his body of work, not on any single game. He could have four int's next week, and that would not mean a whole lot to me. In fact, how he would bounce back from such a game would mean more than that game itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...