Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rod of refereeing.

Harbingers

By Harbingers,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, backINblack28 said:

i'm asssuming he means one ref and one linesman which makes sense while also advocating for replay review of penalties

My issue is plenty of stuff happens behind the ref/play, that’s what the second ref is for. If the bench refs could call too I wouldn’t have an issue. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
backINblack28 Proficient

backINblack28

Posted
Posted

i agree--i mean i don't agree with him in the sense that i think i'd keep all the refs--i can see dropping one linesman cause if you miss an offsides it'll be reviewed anyway. they should get rid of the being shorthanded sh if you get a review wrong cause goaltender interference is subjective as 'did he catch a football' and is ridiculous to cost you a goal if the refs stand by what was called. i do think some of the stuff should be plenty reviewable 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, backINblack28 said:

i agree--i mean i don't agree with him in the sense that i think i'd keep all the refs--i can see dropping one linesman cause if you miss an offsides it'll be reviewed anyway. they should get rid of the being shorthanded sh if you get a review wrong cause goaltender interference is subjective as 'did he catch a football' and is ridiculous to cost you a goal if the refs stand by what was called. i do think some of the stuff should be plenty reviewable 

It can’t hurt in trying it for a season. I could see the refs pushing back though. They like their little kingdoms, even when they get things wrong. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
backINblack28 Proficient

backINblack28

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

It can’t hurt in trying it for a season. I could see the refs pushing back though. They like their little kingdoms, even when they get things wrong. 

sure they do--and that's what's lacking--the accountability there. it gets exposed over and over again in the playoffs as so terribly subjective but also while they let tons of stuff go until they decide not to. then nothing changes, just like NFL. people love to talk about the chiefs/bengals trash reffing that weren't paying attention when the panthers got screwed out of browns/@ ATL because of the same

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...