Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Buying a new TV


Cat

Recommended Posts

We are replacing our TV in the bonus room (48" Sony HD projection, if anyone wants to buy for cheap) with a plasma TV. I was thinking about going with the same TV we have downstairs, a 50" Samsung 720p at Best Buy right now for $740 or should I spend the extra $320 and get the Samsung 50" 1080i? That way we at least have one 1080i.

What do you think about the Panasonic Plasmas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cat, BluRay is, right now, the only source that will output 1080p. Now, you can upscale a video signal to be close, but there is nothing at all wrong with 720p. I would rather 720p than 1080i everyday, but thats me. Why plasma? Would you mind a recommendation as to where to purchase? Check this place out, I have found that they get some TV for less than I get them for as a dealer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking plasma because of pricing but I'm seeing I can get a Samsung 52" LCD 1080i for $1150.00

Only time I imagine we will use the 1080i is when we hook up a computer and we may be getting a PS3 in the next year.

Thanks for the LINK!

edit: sites like that are so bad for me, i get a serious case of the wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was up to me I would stay away from plasmas unless you are putting it in a dark area like a basement. My understanding is plasma tv's do not do well in a room where there is a lot of light.

I recently built a house and bought seven LCD tv's ranging from 32 inches (for the kids bedrooms) to 55 inches for the man cave downstairs. What I did was figure out a budget for each tv and then searched for the best one.

I personally would spend the extra money and get the 1080P if this is going to be the main tv you watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was up to me I would stay away from plasmas unless you are putting it in a dark area like a basement. My understanding is plasma tv's do not do well in a room where there is a lot of light.

I recently built a house and bought seven LCD tv's ranging from 32 inches (for the kids bedrooms) to 55 inches for the man cave downstairs. What I did was figure out a budget for each tv and then searched for the best one.

I personally would spend the extra money and get the 1080P if this is going to be the main tv you watch.

Good point. In my den I have drapes I pull across the windows and it makes the room super dark. LOVE IT! But the Bonus room has a bunch of windows and I dont really want to put drapes up. So maybe I should go LCD. It wont be the main TV we watch.

Isn't 50" a little big for a 720p? How does the picture look?

1080p is amazing for blu-ray... I would pay extra for it. :drool5:

It looks great to me. My brother has a 58" 1080i and I don't see much of a difference when watching TV maybe when watching a Blu-Ray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would recommend going with a tv that's built for the future. Go with the 1080 over 720, especially at that size.

The only thing I would do differently would be to buy a bigger one. I have a 54" 1080 Panasonic Plasma. If they made them bigger, I would have done it. Looks great in my den because the ceiling is wooden and dark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks great to me. My brother has a 58" 1080i and I don't see much of a difference when watching TV maybe when watching a Blu-Ray.

When comparing 1080i to 1080p, it's important to note the 1080i screens often aren't the full 1920x1080 resolution horizontally whereas 1080p screens tend to have the full resolution.

For example, I have one of the last 1080i CRT projection screens made. Its resolution is something like 1280x1080. Because on an interlaced screen, it's difficult to tell visually between 1280 horizontal pixels and 1920.

Progressive screens are an entirely different ball game, they have more resolution and the refresh twice as often, which is why 1080p tends to look a lot better than 1080i. (but also a lot more artificial).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically everyone thinks I should spend money and buy one of the best out there.

Sounds good! Thanks everyone.

:)

Not everyone...I am a huge DLP advocate. See the Mitsubishi 72" for around $1500, now show me the same size LCD or PDP in that same price range and see how much you get. Now you're not going to hang a DLP on the wall, but you damn sure get more bang for your buck. It all depends on what you're wanting. These 'top-of-the-line' TV's are going to do nothing but go down in price. The new sh_t is always going to cost more. What is the TV used for? Gameday & fight night? Movies? General TV watching? Those answers should determine what TV you get, not opinions of others including me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everyone...I am a huge DLP advocate. See the Mitsubishi 72" for around $1500, now show me the same size LCD or PDP in that same price range and see how much you get. Now you're not going to hang a DLP on the wall, but you damn sure get more bang for your buck. It all depends on what you're wanting. These 'top-of-the-line' TV's are going to do nothing but go down in price. The new sh_t is always going to cost more. What is the TV used for? Gameday & fight night? Movies? General TV watching? Those answers should determine what TV you get, not opinions of others including me...

video games only sometimes but at the moment mostly cartoons lol. its mostly used by my 3 year old. But when me and my husband both want to play video games one of us will be using it and that will usually be at night. If we got a 1080p and the size is no smaller than 50" we would switch it out with the one in the den so we could hook up our computer too it and eventually a PS3 and take advantage of the higher res

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Progressive screens are an entirely different ball game, they have more resolution and the refresh twice as often, which is why 1080p tends to look a lot better than 1080i. (but also a lot more artificial).

They don't refresh twice as often....1080i draws 540 horizontal scan lines at one time. Progressive draws all 1080 of them at once. That's why 1080i and 720p look practically the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ummm not sure adding anther 5'9 180 pound soaking wet forward is the way to go here.....    
    • What has happened in HS athletics busted full force into the college world with this NIL/transfer portal stuff. HS sports has been jacked up for a long time now. You have all these "prep schools" that are basically just diploma mills for athletes who hoover up all the good athletes they can get and they're all on scholarship. Then they go out and recruit decent athletes with rich parents to come onboard and pay outrageous tuition while they tout their success at getting their athletes college scholarships. Yeah, those athletes getting college scholarships are the same ones you're giving scholarships to so that you can use them to recruit the rich kids whose parents can pay for it all. You see the same thing in youth travel ball leagues. The whole thing is just getting crazy.
    • It's your right to refer to it as vague, but it still flouts the theory of "zero evidence" that Tepper is changing. Here's another: "Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales and general manager Dan Morgan are reportedly being given a larger leadership role within the organization. Panthers owner David Tepper 'has taken a more hands-off approach of late,' according to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler. 'He's trying to trust Canales and GM Dan Morgan to get it right, knowing that the roster requires patience in its current state,' Fowler wrote. 'We shall see if he holds to that.'" https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10146782-report-panthers-david-tepper-has-taken-a-more-hands-off-approach-to-team   ""David Tepper just wants to win and he's gonna supply everything that we need to win.. Things are changing around here and things are looking really positive" ~ Dan Morgan  https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/1917639137550627107?t=6vgo8yXTO6eD0Gb55hyzNg&s=19   From about 2:15-6:35, Julian Council, Locked on Panthers, gives his take on whether Tepper seems to be changing (and specifically referenced the war room in his analysis):    Dean Jones of Cat Crave on David Tepper in the war room. "He was an innocent bystander throughout a hugely important decision, placing full trust in Morgan and Tilis to make the right call." Jones also quoted Pat McAfee: "What I noticed though, at one point, they looked at (David) Tepper to get an answer, Tepper didn’t say sh*t. All anybody has said about Tepper is that he’s hands-on, hands-on, hands-on. Too handsy, too involved. He’s not letting the football people do their thing. We just watched in the biggest moment for their franchise, a top ten pick, he just sat there and let everybody do their jobs. I think if you’re a Panthers fan, you love everything you saw there." https://catcrave.com/silence-from-david-tepper-becomes-panthers-loudest-victory Granted, you're not getting a major headline here, but that's not going to happen anyway. Fowler isn't exactly a nobody, everybody knows McAfee, and you also have some locals that follow the team (including Dean Jones). Of course you have a right to believe that Tepper hasn't really changed, but to say there is no evidence that he just may be changing is not really true. It's just not. Hate the guy, but the way that he has handled this current regime is different than he handled previous teams, and his silence in the war room and publicly in general is different than years back.
×
×
  • Create New...