Sign Vick

[PantherPhann89]

It simply amazes me how many Vick haters are on this site. Vick is a better option than any QB on our roster. He's soon to be an available FA, whats the problem???? Sign Vick

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Vick has more passing TDs this season than Matt Moore, and a higher QB rating than both Moore & Delhomme. The kid can still play and he will be a starter again in the NFL.

True, but that's a bit deceptive. Vick is benefitting from playing behind one of the league's best quarterbacks. It's McNabb who is doing the dirty work of getting Vick in these positions to be successful to begin with.

Again, I'm not ruling Vick out. I'm just saying I don't think we've seen enough yet to say he's back -- and even then, the questions surrounding his ability to be an effective passer still stand.

[KillerKat]

Vick for 2009: 6/13 , 1TD (Same as Moore)

Don't be stupid.

[ZedLeppelin]

Yes, but with a free agent you've at least been able to watch the player for at least a year or more, in which they played as a full-time player. Even with a rookie, you've seen what they can do in college playing the majority of the snaps at their position.

You guys are enamored with Vick's success in the Wildcat formation, or his success running the ball. The biggest question mark surrounding Vick -- and one that hovered over him well before he went to prison -- was whether he could actually be an accurate NFL passer or not.

So I ask you Vick fans: has he shown you in his limited time on the field that he can do that? Because we've already got several players on the team that are capable of running the ball.

I don't think he's going to be Peyton manning accurate but he's far better and more accurate then all of the delhommes, fryes, moores or any other qbs we could realistically have next year not to mention he has a MUCH better deep ball (night and day) and he still had the speed as he showed on the wildcat TD.

I will go so far as to say that if he ends up on Buffalo or some other worthless team while we pass to go with someone like Frye or Moore (unless he shows dramatic improvement in the next 3 games) I will be legitimately pissed.

[KillerKat]

Completion %: Moore 62.5% , Vick 45.5%

Vick is more accurate?

[King Taharqa]

Vick for 2009: 6/13 , 1TD (Same as Moore)

Don't be stupid.

As a third string backup. Matt Moore has started 2 games. Throw in Vick's 2 rushing TDs and higher QB rating, and its no contest.

[ZedLeppelin]

Completion %: Moore 62.5% , Vick 45.5%

Vick is more accurate?

You better hope Vick doesn't complete his next 3 or 4 passes or he will have you beat. Sample size much?

[CharlotteBeer.com]

I don't think he's going to be Peyton manning accurate but he's far better and more accurate then all of the delhommes, fryes, moores or any other qbs we could realistically have next year not to mention he has a MUCH better deep ball (night and day) and he still had the speed as he showed on the wildcat TD.

I will go so far as to say that if he ends up on Buffalo or some other worthless team while we pass to go with someone like Frye or Moore (unless he shows dramatic improvement in the next 3 games) I will be legitimately pissed.

What's with all of the Frye talk? Are you talking about Charlie Frye? I haven't even heard talk of us pursuing him.

Unless, of course, you're talking about Greg (Keg) Frye. He's not in actuality an NFL player, no matter what his swole tucks say otherwise.

[JungleCat]

We don't need Vick, we've got enough problems. :beatdeadhorse5:

[KillerKat]

As a third string backup. Matt Moore has started 2 games. Throw in Vick's 2 rushing TDs and higher QB rating, and its no contest.

How about Moore also owns Vick in completion percentage, yards per game, and yards per attempt as well? Moore is the one that owns Vick. Im sorry that color blinds you.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

You guys think the stats are biased towards Moore? Are you crazy?

That would be like Delhomme leading the team down the field, the Panthers put Moore in on the 5-yard line, and he throws for a TD or runs one in. The stats are in favor of Vick here because he hasn't played enough to generate a large enough sample size.

[KillerKat]

You better hope Vick doesn't complete his next 3 or 4 passes or he will have you beat. Sample size much?

lol now you're mentioning sample size when you say we should sign Vick based on 1 throw and make an incorrect statment that Moore couldn't make the same throw when he's done it twice and further.

[Mr. Scot]

It's never going to happen.

It's not a good idea.

It's stupid to even discuss it.

And yet someone will always bring it up

[DaCityKats]

you cant really compare moore and vick bc moore has 2 starts compared to vicks couple of plays.thats just not fair.