Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why didn't John Fox have any loyalty to Rodney Peete?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Here's something I've been trying to figure out today. When John Fox came in 2002, one of his first signings was Rodney Peete at quarterback. He obviously knew that Peete wasn't a long-term solution at age 36, but check out Peete's 2002 stats:

223 of 381, 2,630 yards, 15 TDs, 14 picks, won 4 of his last 5 games in 2002.

And here's what got him benched at halftime during Opening Day 2003: 4 of 10, 19 yards, 0 TDs, 0 picks

Looking at Peete's half vs. Jacksonville in 2003, those numbers look downright awesome compared to several games that Jake has had this season.

Now I'm not about to say that Fox was wrong in benching Peete and turning it over Delhomme because he absolutely was. But why was he so quick to pull Peete in Opening Day no less and yet has refused to officially bench Jake despite having the worst season in franchise history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something I've been trying to figure out today. When John Fox came in 2002, one of his first signings was Rodney Peete at quarterback. He obviously knew that Peete wasn't a long-term solution at age 36, but check out Peete's 2002 stats:

223 of 381, 2,630 yards, 15 TDs, 14 picks, won 4 of his last 5 games in 2002.

And here's what got him benched at halftime during Opening Day 2003: 4 of 10, 19 yards, 0 TDs, 0 picks

Looking at Peete's half vs. Jacksonville in 2003, those numbers look downright awesome compared to several games that Jake has had this season.

Now I'm not about to say that Fox was wrong in benching Peete and turning it over Delhomme because he absolutely was. But why was he so quick to pull Peete in Opening Day no less and yet has refused to officially bench Jake despite having the worst season in franchise history?

Think you answered your own question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you answered your own question

That, plus history. Prior to his meltdown, Delhomme had led the team through a Super Bowl season, an NFC Championship and some other good times. That kind of history makes it tough to let someone go. Peete, prior to his exodus, had won some games but nothing major.

Worth noting that one of the reasons Gross gave for re-signing with Carolina was Jake Delhomme. Guys that go to war together build loyalty to each other.

Mind you, that's not a defense of the decision to stay with Delhomme longer than he should have, just an explanation. I understand why he did it, but it was still the wrong decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s wild to me that so many of you guys are threatened by the idea of an opposing team fan who is polite in 2025. He’s been posting here on and off for years, usually when our teams play each other which hasn’t been for a while. I’d maybe understand this treatment if it was a falcons or saints fan, but packers fans in general are one of the nicer fan bases as long as you aren’t another NFC north team (especially the bears).   
    • Some players excel on the big stage, while others freeze and succumb to the pressure. I’m not convinced Cam took a dive. I think he didn’t handle the stage very well. The pressure got to him and he folded. He wouldn’t be the first quarterback or player to struggle in a Super Bowl. Two HOF examples - John Elway and Jim Kelly. The 2002 MVP, Rich Gannon, threw 5 interceptions against the Bucs. Poor performances happen.  Unless of course you believe all these players threw the games they played in, but if that occurred, surely someone by now would have admitted taking a dive? 🤷‍♂️
    • It was always a matter of time with Cam’s playing style and a shorter shelf life than passers that protect themselves. I suppose Cam could have still been playing in 2028 ten years after the hit took place, but he would need to have evolved as a quarterback and become more of a passer than the dual threat maestro he was. It’s sad because it makes us think of what could have been, but I do feel it was always a matter of time until all the hits took their toll.
×
×
  • Create New...