Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hoover's 3rd and 9


bleys

Recommended Posts

If there was ever a time that Fox would be aggressive and play to win- it was this play that will forever define the man known as John Fox.

With his 8th year coming to an end, one more left if the swarming rumors of him being fired are proven false, and having a huge question mark at the QB position next year (that will either make or break his job as a Panther HC...)

He decides or allows Hoover to run the ball instead of testing the only guy who should have had the ball in his hand at the time, Matt Moore.

With the season over within a couple hours of that moment, it was too much of a risk to let loose and see what your QB can do in that moment when under pressure and also to give him that much needed experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^Yeah I'm all for Fox and all but I'm tired of seeing Hoover run on Third and long or really third and Mid range..I mean I understand if we let Sutton or someone do it but SRSLY Hoov... and this isn't the first game that we've done it either.....I guess he's just getting him some deserved carries to boost his stats...

I'd love for him to throw to DJ or Moose a little more...as Billick has been stressing this whole game we need to see what we have....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...